• BlameThePeacock
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yes and no. There isn’t plenty of available land where people want to live. You’d have to buy up existing properties to build up. Even if it got rezoned, it would take decades to get enough people to sell and move out to build 3.5 million more units and that’s the build target for 2030 (which is only 6 years from now if we’re being generous)

    • Pyr_Pressure
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      There’s not plenty of land with infrastructure to support people. That many houses also needs more schools, hospitals, roads, gas stations, grocery stores, etc

      It’s not just houses we need to build.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        There’s not plenty of land with infrastructure to support people.

        You may not have understood my point. The land I’m talking about already has infrastructure; you just have to bulldoze the houses that are already there and replace them with multifamily.

        • Pyr_Pressure
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Schools only have a set amount of space and hospitals a set amount of beds.

          Bulldoze a neighbourhood of 500 detached units housing 1500 people, 500 of which are children, to build towers which can house 6000, 2000 of which are children, you will then need to bulldoze the school which was there to be able to build another school 4x as large or find vacant land to build extra schools.

          More people = more infrastructure not just houses.