This community is housed on an instance run by two trans women, focused on the needs of the queer and gender diverse community.

We allowed 196 here because we were promised the community is queer and trans inclusive.

If you’re here it’s because you’re aggressively supportive of trans folk. Not middle of the ground, not “just asking questions”.

If your response to that is, “yes, but…” then this isn’t the instance for you, and by extension, this isn’t the community for you.

tl;dr - Unambiguous support and inclusion, or fuck off somewhere else.

Edit - I changed the phrase "aggressive support to “unambiguous support”, as there was some confusion over the intent behind my previous phrasing.

    • Unmarketable Plushie@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      59
      ·
      11 months ago

      One of the mods made a post about how this comment being really creepy about trans men’s bodies somehow wasn’t transphobic and then deleted it after people started calling them out lol

      • LeylaaLovee@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        11 months ago

        Thank you for providing good context on this thread. The original comment was ass, but not important overall. If the mod hadn’t decided to explicitly defend it, this wouldn’t even be a conversation. This entire discourse would have been avoided if it wasn’t for a shitty mod post.

          • Good Girl [she/they]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            11 months ago

            Fuck off.

            Genital preferences are valid as far as any preference for physical attributes but when you’re reducing people to purely genitals it’s gross and no respect needs to be given to the argument.

            • BraBraBra@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              18
              ·
              11 months ago

              That’s not what happened. In the context of dating and sex it’s an extremely relevant point. Sounds like you’re mad at a headline without reading the article, in a manner of speaking. So you fuck off.

                • BraBraBra@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  15
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  No it didn’t. He explained he would be put off by a transitioned trans man. Go through their comment history and you’ll see they’d be comfortable dating preop, as long as their partner is comfortable with them finding their femininity attractive.

                • priapus@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  That is not at all what it said. The original commenter said that he would not be willing to date a trans man after they transition because he cannot find a penis sexually attractive and because he does find boons sexually attractive. This is a completely ok thing to say, it’s what was said after this original comment that became a problem. The post should not have been made by the mod, because it led to a lot of transphobes commenting.

          • LeylaaLovee@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            11 months ago

            The mod could have just… Not responded to it like they don’t respond to thousands of comments. You’re not listening to the point. If you’re straight, don’t fuck trans men because you view them as women because vagina and boob

            • BraBraBra@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              11 months ago

              You’re missing the point. His point was explicitly that he wouldn’t date post op trans men.

              What you saying right now was literally his point. To date a trans man because finda him attractive for his femininity wouldn’t work. That was literally his entire point.

      • BraBraBra@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        11 months ago

        The guy said he wasn’t into dicks and that it would be weird to like something about his partner that they would want gone and dislike. That’s not transphobic. It honestly bonkers that people find that to be transphobic.

      • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        57
        ·
        11 months ago

        There was some transphobia that came crawling out like usually happens when a trans topic starts getting active

        That is what prompted this post. It happens every single time trans stuff comes up. There is no space for it here.

          • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            61
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Yes, I’m aware. You can see the list here https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/modlog?page=1&userId=170858

            They were removed, because a meme community on a trans run instance isn’t the place for a discussion on the specifics of why you don’t want to fuck trans people.

            We hear that enough, every day, in every place we look online. We don’t need it here too.

            Was the post transphobic? That depends on who you ask, but either way, what it wasn’t is “unambiguously supportive”

            It’s also worth pointing out that those posts were not the trigger for this thread

            • Zymi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              46
              ·
              11 months ago

              a meme community on a trans run instance isn’t the place for a discussion on the specifics of why you don’t want to fuck trans people.

              I really wish more people got this

              • JackbyDev@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                11
                ·
                11 months ago

                It’s like Pokémon, you made eye contact with someone on a meme sub and suddenly you’re forced into a debate you don’t want to have.

                👀 Barbie or Oppenheimer? Answer me, Zymi!

            • Lemdee@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              11 months ago

              It’s also worth pointing out that those posts were not the trigger for this thread

              That’s a relief! I was a little worried because I like this instance but was butting heads in the one post. Thank you for running this instance. I threw what money I can at the moment to the blahaj.zone Kofi because I feel bad I might’ve made your job harder as an admin lol

        • Juno@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          I was thinking about this in the context of a conversation I was privy to recently boiled down it was basically “I don’t have a problem with trans people But…sexually assaulting kids is bad But…teaching sexual orientation to 3 year Olds is bad”

          I don’t want to have to feel like I need to “just leave”

        • LeylaaLovee@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          11 months ago

          It seems very “chaser” to me. In other comments, the poster mentioned how he was attracted to “post op trans women and pre op trans men”. Grouping those two demographics together in this way will never be seen as not chaser.

            • LeylaaLovee@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              21
              ·
              11 months ago

              Someone who fetishizes trans people. You find trans people hot? That’s totally fine, you can have preferences. But grouping post op trans women and pre op trans men sexually is saying that they’re being viewed as women regardless of their identity.

              If you wanna fuck a trans person, it should be because you’re attracted to them. Maybe you like boobs and penis together and that’s fine. Maybe you like a masculine chest and a vagina. You can be attracted to a certain intersection, even if that intersection is a straight one. But fucking them because they’re trans and exotic is chasing. If you like women, fuck trans women. If you like men, fuck trans men. But don’t just randomly flip them around like there’s no difference to you.

              • BraBraBra@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                The guy just said that penises put him off, good god. Is it common in the trans community for people to find it transphobic when cis people aren’t attracted to them post transition? Because while I fully support the right to be trans and transition, that is pretty nuts to find it transphobic just because someone doesn’t find you attractive.

                • LeylaaLovee@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  12
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  That’s not the issue. You can’t say “yeah I like women” and then say that includes pre op trans men. That’s fucking gross to say. He literally did the “oh noooo but your boobs!” You guys really go straight to being condescending before you actually try to understand anything, Jesus fucking Christ.

                  • BraBraBra@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    8
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    He said the boobs would be an issue in a relationship with a trans man because he would attracted to a source of the person’s dysphoria, which would make them incompatible.

                    Someone literally asked for his opinion on this matter, in a post that invited the opinions of straight people. There is no grossness or transphobia here. Someone asked him if he would date trans men and he explained why they would be incompatible.

                • GraySanity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  well, yes and no

                  to my personal experience, it can feel kind of transphobic, as being in the position of being rejected just because of your genitals, and not because of the rest of your personality and appearance/gender expression just feels wrong and mean somehow, but if I try to rationalize it, saying that such pereference is transphobic feels just as bad, as you cant force someones pereference

                  there needs to be said that the person did not see the implication of praising/complementing someones genitals that were the problem (in the case of the original post “And it would propably be difficult with me going ‘I love your boobs’ and they’re always like ‘I hate my boobs’”). As praising or giving a trans person a complement on the bodyparts which are a big part of their disphoria is just mean and very painfull for most of them (this was propably unintended tho, and I expect the original postter didn’t think about this, but still)

                  [pre-anything transfem btw]

                  • MBM@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    11 months ago

                    the person did not see the implication of praising/complementing someones genitals that were the problem

                    Wasn’t that the point of the comment? They got asked if they’d date a trans guy and responded that it wouldn’t work out because what they’re attracted to is exactly what makes the trans guy dysphoric

                    Edit: the post the comments were under was a bit weird about trans though, I’d be fine with that not existing here

                  • BraBraBra@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    Most people expect sex within weeks. And no matter how great you find someone, if sex with them is a chore due to you not finding their sexual organs appealing(which is something you can’t really control), that’s not going to be an ideal relationship.

                    And on the point of finding something attractive about your partner that is the source of their dysphoria, that seems like a recipe for disaster and hurt.

                    I can understand how it doesn’t feel great to read those points and how it’s a talking point that you wouldn’t want to see in communities you follow, but to call it transphobic just because it’s hurtful just doesn’t seem sound imho.

                    But in this case at least it’s not simply boiling someone down to their sexual organs, but rather recognizing how their sexual organs could realistically affect the relationship.

    • persolb@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      11 months ago

      Honestly I didn’t realize this was a trans community. I thought ‘196’ was just some random number like the ‘4’ in 4chan. 196 just had good content. The fact it’s inclusive is just a bonus.

      • DrQuint@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        11 months ago

        That’s partially to blame for all 196 communities having this weird “if you know you know” approach to writing their mission statement and rules. I’ve seen numerous people ask wth is 196 because of how vague the communities they saw were.

        But, particularly about the social politics, here’s also the thing I think. Trans rights are human rights. Communities fall under two categories: Welcoming to trans people, versus inherently evil. So I don’t think that a community is pro-trans should ever have to be stated. It should be assume, and whoever has a problem with it should go fuck off from society, Satan has a place for them.

        • priapus@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Tbf, this one does mention it on the about page, so it’s more obvious to newcomers than r/196 was.

      • Yulia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s not a trans community per se, it’s more of a more trans-friendly shitposting community. Like, I think, even now majority of posters aren’t trans. And majority of content is not trans-themed, it’s not traa. It’s a good place if you don’t want to see only trans-themed memes, but also don’t want to see transphobia