In her appeal, Maxwell’s lawyers said prosecutors scapegoated her because Epstein was dead and “public outrage” demanded that prosecutors pin blame somewhere.

The lawyers also said the government waited too long to bring charges, and that Maxwell was immune under a 2007 non-prosecution agreement between Epstein and federal prosecutors in Florida.

In addition, Maxwell’s lawyers said the trial was tainted because one juror failed to disclose he had been sexually abused as a child.

Prosecutors believe the appeal is meritless.

  • Ledivin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    3 months ago

    In addition, Maxwell’s lawyers said the trial was tainted because one juror failed to disclose he had been sexually abused as a child.

    What the actual fuck?

    Idk, that one actually seems pretty cut and dry. It’s hard to stay objective when the crime seems extra-heinous to you

      • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        It hits much different when you have personal trauma. Take your disgust and multiply it by a factor of 1,000. Then double it.

    • snooggums@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 months ago

      What about people who married someone who was abused? Or has a child that was abused? Or a niece or nephew or parent or sibling or friend or…

      Gonna be a pretty small jury pool!

    • TheTetrapod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’ve served on a jury. There’s no convenient, private moment to raise your hand, in the middle of a group of strangers, and say “yes, sorry, I was raped as a child,” and such a person shouldn’t be expected to air their greatest traumas in a public setting.

    • skulblaka@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’d argue that’s exactly who we want on the jury. Who would know better exactly how heinous the crime is than someone who lived through it?

      • NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        You don’t see the issue with someone who has personally suffered the exact type of crime that they are judging?

        Maybe just a little bit of bias towards conviction “ just in case”

        • skulblaka@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I forget sometimes that the function of a jury is to establish the fact of guilt and nothing else. Deciding appropriate punishment is not within their domain, that’s for the judge.

          In that context I do agree with you and I suppose I retract my earlier statement.

      • Ledivin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        No, by that logic, no woman who has been raped could sit on the jury. Being a victim of a specific crime is an extra level of negative association, and are often looking to punish people, overlooking evidence that exonerated them.

        Do I think Maxwell is innocent? Absolutely not. Is there a chance for a mistrial here? Definitely a chance.