3volver@lemmy.world to Unpopular Opinion@lemmy.world · 1 year agoYou can't claim to be an environmentalist and be anti-nuclear energy at the same timemessage-squaremessage-square138linkfedilinkarrow-up1175arrow-down168
arrow-up1107arrow-down1message-squareYou can't claim to be an environmentalist and be anti-nuclear energy at the same time3volver@lemmy.world to Unpopular Opinion@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square138linkfedilink
minus-squareConyak@lemmy.tflinkfedilinkarrow-up15arrow-down2·1 year agoI am 100% supportive of nuclear and still disagree with OP. Not supporting nuclear does NOT automatically mean you are not an environmentalist. That is just beyond stupid to me.
minus-squarespujb@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down2·edit-21 year agook but i think there’s a big distinction between “not supporting” and being anti-nuclear energy, which is what OP actually said.
minus-squareCryophilia@lemmy.worldBanned from communitylinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down4·1 year agoI disagree. I think it’s a small, nitpicky distinction. OP made his meaning clear.
I am 100% supportive of nuclear and still disagree with OP. Not supporting nuclear does NOT automatically mean you are not an environmentalist. That is just beyond stupid to me.
ok but i think there’s a big distinction between “not supporting” and being anti-nuclear energy, which is what OP actually said.
I disagree. I think it’s a small, nitpicky distinction. OP made his meaning clear.