• killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    5 months ago

    Bingo. Capitalism has thus far rejected the blockchain, which is generally evidence that it doesn’t solve an important problem either efficiently, safely or cheaply.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      To be fair, there are plenty of other reasons capitalism might have rejected blockchain: market failure, interference by government, etc.

      I’m not saying that to defend cryptocurrency, by the way, but rather to point out that capitalism isn’t perfect at allocating resources in every situation.

      • capitalism is generally terrible at allocating ressources. It will always win to externalize costs, and if the people footing the bill cannot participate in the market, like for instance future generations, the result is always a self destructive system.

      • Katana314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Isn’t one of its goals to be free from government influence? That’s not a valid excuse.

    • parpol@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Bitcoin had its official ETF approved and started the other week and Ethereum is soon to follow. so I would say capitalism is very much not rejecting blockchain technology. Didn’t blackrock and other giants put a ton in?

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Bitcoin had its official ETF approved and started the other week and Ethereum is soon to follow. so I would say capitalism is very much not rejecting blockchain technology. Didn’t blackrock and other giants put a ton in?

        Right?

        Also, look at its price. It dipped, and came right back.

        If anything, the financial consensus around this is exactly the opposite of what was being presented.