• BallShapedMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    The Court said it “finds the FTC has not shown a likelihood it will prevail on its claim this particular vertical merger in this specific industry may substantially lessen competition”.

  • Trifictional
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Unsuprising.

    I was following this case all week and the FTC really embarrassed itself. If this injunction was granted it would have been even more s suprising than the CMA coming out of nowhere to block the acquisition.

    • max1mum_d3ath@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Were you hoping for the acquisition to be denied? I’m curious to hear if/why people think this going through will be bad.

        • Wodge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Based on what? 4 games? Acti/Blizzard aren’t the publishing powerhouse they once were. They have Warcraft, Diablo, CoD and Hearthstone. Yes, there is also King, but all that is f2p mobile jank.

          • imaBEES@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Apparently King is the money-printing machine that this deal was primarily about, all the Activision/Blizzard games are just a bonus

            • Wodge@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don’t doubt this to be true, but all the attempts to block the deal have centered around Call of Duty.

              • Eochaid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                That’s only because of Sony. They’re the only ones that kept bringing up CoD - accusing, without evidence, that MS is going to make it exclusive to Xbox.

                Phil Spencer / Microsoft only ever talked about CoD in response to Sony’s allegations - and that was to say they have no intention of taking CoD from PS and to offer long term deals as assurance.

                And furthermore, to confirm that because they’re a distant #3 in the market, cutting off Activision’s biggest game from the current market leader would be a great way to cut off a big chunk of their new acquisition’s revenue.

                • Wodge@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I agree completely, I actually want this deal to go through for a few reasons.

                  1. I want CoD on game pass so I don’t have to feel guilty about dropping the game after 2 weeks into season 2.
                  2. I want Sony to get a kick up the arse and stop being 100% reliant on third person action adventures. I want a new Killzone and Resistance.
                  3. Phil Spencer, while being a corporate executive, seems genuine, and he actually plays games. Jim Ryan on the other hand, comes across as bit of a cockend.
          • Skiptrace@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Honestly that’s only due to people not realizing the value of the Xbox Series Consoles, and the absolute STEAL that is Gamepass Ultimate.

            You can’t get a PS5 or Switch for 34.99 a month with 400+ games for free with it. Xbox All Access is 34.99 a month for 2 years and you outright own the Series X, and get 2 years of Gamepass Ultimate. It’s the same cost as a Series X and 2 years of Gamepass Ultimate, but stretched out over 2 years. It’s an absolute STEAL. Especially for PC gamers who want a cheap library expansion, and want a way to easily play a ton of games on their couch.

            • Defaced@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s nice yeah but honestly it doesn’t have the staying power like ps plus. Meaning I see games rotate out much more frequently on game pass than ps plus, and I own a series s and ps5 and have subs for both. The games PlayStation gets are frequently better quality than Xbox in ps plus extra than gamepass and gamepass is also filled to the brim with garbage low effort indie games. If your only need for gamepass is Microsoft’s games then sure, but I would bet my ps plus library has much more monetary value. Also if you’re buying a console through payments then maybe you need to take a step back and understand your financial priorities.

              • Skiptrace@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                It’s Interest Free, and I couldn’t afford to save the 500 dollars for a Series X, but adding another 34.99 to the month to month budget was pretty stinking easy to do.

        • Dudewitbow@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Has there ever been a point in history where the 3rd largest company has become the sole monopoly?

      • itscountolaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        When was the last time such an acquisition led to something positive for gamers?

        I am all for timed exclusives if that means Microsoft or Sony help funding the game that wouldn’t have the budget otherwise. However I am against acquisitions, be it from Microsoft or from Sony.

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      According to a separate article, it doesn’t sound like there are any plans for it, even post-merger.

      Just glad we’re getting Starfield for now…

  • scutiger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Activision Blizzard boss Bobby Kotick also issued a statement: "Our merger will benefit consumers and workers. It will enable competition rather than allow entrenched market leaders to continue to dominate our rapidly growing industry.”

    He says, attempting a merger with an “entrenched market leader.”

    This is awful for consumers.

      • scutiger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Among Sony and Nintendo, Microsoft is bringing up the rear in console sales, but they own 20+ game studios, including Bethesda. What is that if not a market leader in gaming?

        • AlexanderTheGreat@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not a market wiz but I think owning a bunch has nothing to do with being a market leader. Selling a bunch and being the best selling is what puts you on top.

  • echoplex21@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    The FTC showing why it damages Sony (the market leader) rather than trying to prove why it damages consumers was their biggest issue. Horrible case from them.

    • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Penguin Random House tried to acquire Simon and Schuster in 2022 and was successfully blocked by the Justice department

  • hiyaaaaa23@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is anyone actually surprised.

    Give it 10 years, COD is gone from PS4

    Not that I really love COD, but monopolies are bad.

    • AceofSpades
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Phil Spencer said he had no intention of removing CoD from PS5. He never mentioned what will happen when the PS6 comes out.

      • Dinochimp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s not true, they explicitly stated they were referring to Playstation as a whole and not specifically the PS5. You can look up the source.

        The FTC and the judge aren’t going to be “gotcha ya” by word games. This was a trail under oath not some nebulous PR statement.