• emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    I wonder what will happen if he meets the North Korean President. You clearly can’t have two Supreme Leaders. Maybe it’ll go like that scene in Great Dictator where Chaplin meets Mussolini.

      • Showroom7561
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Clearly, Supreme Leader is not just a translation choice when the BBC mentions it quite specifically numerous times in this article.

          • xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            This is such a obviously intentional misinterpretation, but for the sake of clarity:

            No, they’re arguing that he is referred to by a Persian term that directly translates to “supreme leader”

          • Showroom7561
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            11 months ago

            No doubt that he’s called that. I think the term is ridiculous and wonder why they give these people such silly titles.

            But it goes beyond being a “translation choice”.

              • Showroom7561
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                11 months ago

                I don’t know what you’re going on about. “Supreme Leader” is such an ego-inflated, better-than-thou title.

                It’s hilarious and silly to put on a leader. English, non-English, Iran or the UK. It doesn’t matter! LOL