Likely relevant with the increasing size of the Lemmy federation.

  • weex@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    My theory is web-of-trust-based moderation can fix this but not on Twitter because they won’t allow such an integration. So we should try it on the fediverse. One of these days I’ll hook this kind of thing up to Mastodon (watch https://github.com/weex/wot-server if you’re interested in knowing when that happens).

    • poVoq@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      Hmm, so like a social credit score for the fediverse? Trolling a bit of course, but that seems like it could have a lot of unintended consequences that are rather bad.

      • Amicese@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Hmm, so like a social credit score for the fediverse? Trolling a bit of course, but that seems like it could have a lot of unintended consequences that are rather bad.

        It just needs to be transparent and openly worked on, unlike the american social credit score system.

        • poVoq@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 years ago

          Even a totally transparent social credit system necessarily results in social chilling and internalized self-censorship. There are different opinions on that and some people consider this the only way to have a harmonious society, but I hope we will find a better solution at some point.

      • weex@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        More of a high-dimensional trust vector but I get your point. We won’t know the consequences until we try it. Some of the potential advantages are scalability, transparency, optionality, automation, resistance to bots, and decentralization.