Let’s say someone created a Wikipedia clone with Activitypub support, so you can freely read and edit articles on other servers. Basically the same way that Lemmy works. What would be a good name for such a project? Bonus points if the name goes with a cute animal mascot.

Edit: Here you can see the names of existing Fediverse projects.

  • fishos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Federation, by it’s very nature, is “if I don’t like you, I can just make my own instance and do whatever I want”. How will you find objective truth when people can’t even agree within their own country? You really think we won’t just end up with LeftyWiki and RightyWiki and CommieWiki and FacistWiki? Because federated code would encourage this. You’re literally adding problems when your problem is people based, not code based.

    • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Why is having alternative sources of information that can collaborate a bad thing?

      Why are you even on lemmy, rather than reddit, if you’d rather have a single isolated source of communication?

    • nutomic@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      There are plenty of Wikipedia articles which are not objective, particularly when it comes to politics or history. Of course federation means there would be many different wikis. That makes sense, for example different countries should have their own independent wikis, instead of using one controlled by a different nation.

      • Big P@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        What benefit would federation provide in that case, as people can currently make their own wikis if they want

      • fishos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yes, we can have a US wiki, a Russia Wiki, a China Wiki, a North Korea Wiki, and none of them will agree with each other and you will have reduced an encyclopedia into worthless anecdotes and opinions.

        • Ademir@lemmy.eco.br
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          you will have reduced an encyclopedia into worthless anecdotes and opinions.

          It is Wikipedia then.