• OtterA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    and the flipside is also a problem

    Now legitimate evidence can be dismissed as “AI generated”

      • OtterA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well that’s a new one lol, hadn’t thought of that. That’s another level of planning

    • thanks_shakey_snake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly-- They’re two sides of the same coin. Being convinced by something that isn’t real is one type of error, but refusing to be convinced by something that is real is just as much of an error.

      Some people are going to fall for just about everything. Others are going to be so apprehensive about falling for something that they never believe anything. I’m genuinely not sure which is worse.

      • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        We already saw that with nothing more than two words. Trump started the “fake news” craze, and now 33% of Americans dismiss anything that contradicts their views as fake news, without giving it any thought or evaluation. If a catch phrase is that powerful, imagine how much more powerful video and photography will be. Even in 2019 there was a deep fake floating around of Biden with a Gene Simmons tongue, licking his lips, and I personally know several people who thought it was real.

        • thanks_shakey_snake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Great example. Yeah, I’ve had to educate family members about deepfakes because they didn’t even know that they were possible. This was on the back of some statement like “the only way to know for sure is to see video.” Uh… Sorry fam, I have some bad news…