(Rachel Aiello/CTV News)

    • Stochastic
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Only the no-children amounts differ.

      For example, if you are single you could receive a maximum payment of:

      • $234 if you have no children
      • $387 if you have one child
      • $467 if you have two children
      • $548 if you have three children
      • $628 if you have four children

      And, if you are married or have a common-law partner, you could receive up to:

      • $306 if you have no children
      • $387 if you have one child
      • $467 if you have two children
      • $548 if you have three children
      • $628 if you have four children
      • heartlessevil@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why is the partnered with no children amount higher than the individual with no children amount? Both of them are just for 1 person because your partner is going to get their own refund aren’t they?

        • jadero
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Maybe, but I don’t think so. I think it’s being done as an adjustment to the GST rebate and that goes to only one member of the couple.

          • kakes@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t have children, and my spouse only eats about 1/6 of our food (crumbs, essentially), so it makes perfect sense for the couples rebate to be only that small fraction more than a single person’s, rather than being 2x.

            • jadero
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I agree completely! I think the system sucks, but that’s how it currently operates. And always will unless we’re going to hit the streets in mass rallies and protests.