• Ech@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    11 months ago

    Watch something else? There’s a functionally infinite amount of content out there, and most of it isn’t about billionaires.

  • kool_newt@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    It does seem like all the stuff that’s pushed most in popular culture is about “special” people or groups. Whether it’s billionaires or the whole superhero trope about about some kid realizing they are super, i.e. better than everyone else.

    I see it as part of capitalist culture to promote the idea that you are not enough and should aspire to be like these special people. It’s part of the mechanism for creating “temporarily embarassed millionaires”.

  • rhacer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Movies are not always about billionaires, so your premise is incorrect.

    Here’s a short list off the top of my head …

    • Die Hard
    • Rambo
    • Rooster Cogburn
    • Moana
    • Predator
    • Star Wars

    But movies are often about escapism, and rich people can often do things we can’t do.

    Also it’s a great plot device. Minimum Wage Tony Stark couldn’t be Iron Man (despite the fact he built the Mark I suit in a cave).

    The fact that Tony Stark is wealthy being imagination helps in the suspense of disbelief. The same could be said about Bruce Wayne.

    • frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.mlOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Haha, one title I was thinking of posting was “When it’s not about cops or special forces, it’s about billionaires”, so you’ve largely proven my point.

    • DeathbringerThoctar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Rooster Cogburn, the 1975 sequel to True Grit, feels oddly out of place in that list. Blockbuster, blockbuster, serviceable sequel to a genuine classic, blockbuster, blockbuster, blockbuster. I really don’t mean to be critical, the protagonist is clearly not a billionaire so it fits, but I am very curious as to the reasoning.

  • jlow (he/him)@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Watch some copaganda with corrupt cops that almost exclusively do illegal and abhorrent things but are still somehow the good guys / stars of the show!

    (In other news I can recommend this season’s The Apothecary’s Diaries anime about a common girl who is a herbalist that gets kidnapped and sold into the royal palace in fantasy China and solves assorted mysteries and intrigues there. There might be a billionaire / royal love interest but I hope it doesn’t come to that. Atm she always gags or shudders when he tries to flirt with her 👌)

  • Lem Jukes@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I feel like this is pretty flawed. You basically have collected four tv shows from the same ‘rich family drama’ genre and then asked “why are all these rich family dramas about dramatic families with lots of money?”

    And even then glass onion barely feels like it stands in the list you’re trying to make because there’s plenty of crime and detective dramas that don’t focus on the super wealthy.

    • KingOfDemocracy@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      And even then glass onion barely feels like it stands in the list you’re trying to make because there’s plenty of crime and detective dramas that don’t focus on the super wealthy.

      This is incorrect. It’s a convention of the genre that an heiress/tycoon gets murdered and the detective tries to solve it, typically in a mansion.

      This goes back to Agatha Christie, unlike OP was saying, but it seems pointless to deny the class bias exists. Obviously the class bias exists.

    • frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.mlOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/a_murder_at_the_end_of_the_world — “A Murder at the End of the World is a limited series about a Gen Z amateur sleuth and a billionaire’s guests who…”

      https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/arrow — “When presumed-dead billionaire playboy Oliver Queen returns home…”

      Just skimmed thru a list of slop: Schitt’s Creek, Gossip Girl, The White Lotus, Below Deck all seem to be about the haute bourgeoisie.

      What are you trying to claim? That they’re not overrepresented ?

      • Lem Jukes@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’m not trying to claim anything. I’m saying, to my ears, it sounds like you’re just complaining that a genre of storytelling and that tropes within certain genres just exist.

        Why not try promoting the work you feel is underrepresented? What are some ‘better’ things we could be watching instead of the ‘slop’?

        • frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.mlOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’m saying, to my ears, it sounds like you’re just complaining that a genre of storytelling and that tropes within certain genres just exist.

          I am yeah.

  • FiveMacs
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Because they try to appeal to your inner desires for money, fame etc…

    Not too many shows like married with children become successful that they can churn out like the garbage Hollywood loves producing