![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/4271bdc6-5114-4749-a5a9-afbc82a99c78.png)
I mean, dude got it pretty spot on, so can we really criticize the accuracy?
I mean, dude got it pretty spot on, so can we really criticize the accuracy?
I use MATE for this very reason
Woodward had over 100 pieces of extremist content on his phone at the time of the murder, much of which was related to extremist content.
Who wrote and/or reviewed this article?
When people say “Adobe is shit” that usually mean the software not the building material.
I dunno. I’m gonna say it wasn’t complete trash. It’s still better than Nemesis.
I’m pretty sure no part of this is a good thing
"It’ll have to go,” the men of Krikkit said as they headed back for home.
I ripped a bowl FOR THE GLORY OF THE EMPIRE!
No no, keep going
I enjoyed what little of it there was too, but there just wasn’t anything substantial to it. What was there was mechanics FO4 did better 8 years earlier supporting a non existent story and a largely empty world. I was willing to overlook that snapping/building ships/outposts was FO4’s settlement building but somehow worse. I was prepared to accept that individual clothing pieces were no longer a thing in favor of monolithic outfits even though it felt like a step backwards. I was even willing to accept that I couldn’t walk from one side of a settlement to the other without 3 load screens but by the time it got to the “ending” and my own gorram character just chuckles at me for thinking anything whatsoever would be explained it was obvious that I’d been taken for a ride. I liked what was there, or maybe I just really wanted to, but I was much more disappointed by what wasn’t there.
Bethesda’s Starfield was generally a well-regarded RPG,
According to whom? It was a hollow shell of a game with a main storyline that can be summed up as “there is none.”
What argument? What the actual fuck are you talking about?
he’s a libertarian utilitarian dictator not an authoritarian dictator
You said that he’s not an authoritarian dictator. That assertion is laughable, and so patently untrue as to approach ironic satire. What else is there to comprehend? I really don’t get where you’re coming from here.
I have this book and Jesus Fuck that story is nightmare fuel.