The federal government is proposing financial incentives for farmers in lieu of cutting enteric methane emissions that are released in the air when cows burp.
The federal government is proposing financial incentives for farmers in lieu of cutting enteric methane emissions that are released in the air when cows burp.
By “do better” I think they mean “allow me to continue living exactly as I have been with no noticeable changes, hardships or tax increases”
Nah, tax the shit out of me. I live in Québec, I can take it. I spent 6 months this year working directly, or indirectly, in response to climate disasters.
Removing beef would be better than marginal increases in burps.
Removing cars would be better than burps.
Removing oil and gas extraction would do better than burps.
Make hard choices, incremental increases shouldn’t be news.
NATO is making Canada the home of the headquarters for fighting climate change, think they’re doing that because we’re good at it?
These seem odd for some reason. like India with no goods carbon seems wrong? Canadian transport I expect as high due to the expanse of the country.
It’s per capita, so India’s consumer spending of $2T (Macrotrends) is split by 1.42B pop, so $1,282 per capita.
Canada is $1.2T for 33M pop. $26,333 per capita, or 20 times greater than India.
I am not surprised at all that India’s goods consumption per capita is a rounding error.
I didn’t think this was spending, I thought this was carbon production per category, and india produces a lot
I assumed it was consumption, and used spending as a facsimile for it.
Why should SE Asia pay the carbon bill for the West’s consumption?
Agree on that…also where is USA on this?
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357635354_15-Degree_Lifestyles_Towards_A_Fair_Consumption_Space_for_All
Cool thanks for the link