• saigot
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s not a small concession. As the article points out it’s Canada’s third highest source of ghg (13%).

    • Lauchs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      My understanding is that the exemption is for homes heated with oil. The 13% to which you are referring includes ALL buildings and ALL heating methods (gas, electric and oil.)

      So that concession is much smaller.

      And of course, even if the concession were for the entire 13% who do you think will cut emissions more next government, a Liberal/NDP coalition (or either on their own) or the Conservatives?

      • saigot
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The 13% is for heating homes through any means. The current exemption is for oil (8% of homes). The exemption that the conservativesproposed and NDP supported is for all heating. I’m not quite sure how commercial and industrial buildings are effected by this so that’s a good point., and of course our electricity isn’t 100% green yet.

        • Lauchs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          At least as far as I can tell, the 13% is for all buildings, not just residential. From the article:

          Buildings make up another major source of emissions. Greenhouse gas emissions from buildings accounted for 13 per cent of Canada’s total emissions in 2021

          But the larger point is that even if this exemption were for the entire 13%, as recent polling has the Conservatives winning a majority I’d say any of that exemption is worth keeping the Conservatives out of power, if only so the climate has a fighting chance. That exemption would hurt a lot the environment a lot less than the “drill baby drill” motto of the Conservative party.