• kent_eh
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    254
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    9 months ago

    I am hesitant to put my hands on the chest of a woman who hasn’t given consent.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      130
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      One of the few cases where consent of anything can be assumed is lifesaving of a person unable to respond. One of the first steps of cpr is to seek a response to ensure that the person is unconscious before then confirming no pulse.

      But yeah I get why it’s awkward

        • Anamnesis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          77
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          I’m not CPR certified or anything, but I think if you’re just grabbing titties you’re probably doing it wrong.

            • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              26
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Can you post any example of a mob attacking someone for performing CPR on a woman?

              Seems like a pretty wild assumtion that you will be attacked for helping someone in a life threathening state by some nebulous “them.”

          • ArbiterXero@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            9 months ago

            For sure! But I didn’t say you WERE grabbing titties, just that you’re perceived to be.

            I mean just getting the electrodes on for a defibrillator you have to lift their shirt…

            Can you see that being perceived poorly?

            • jimbo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              Unlikely that someone holding a defibrillator next to someone passed out on the ground is going to be perceived poorly.

              • ArbiterXero@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                16
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                9 months ago

                Unfortunately in a panic scenario like that, sometimes people don’t see things as clearly as they might normally.

                And people aren’t great on a normal day either.

                • bluGill@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Fortunately they are cheap and easy to use correctly (and nearly impossible to use wrong), as such they are all over. If you are in a public place I’d be surprised if you didn’t have ready access to a defibrillator in the US, though you may not realize where it is.

              • Cringe2793@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                You would think so, right? But the reality is that men are always assumed to have the worst intentions. Especially in hindsight. i.e. “he didn’t need to do that right? he must be trying to cop a feel”.

                Same reason men aren’t usually kindergarten teachers, because they’re immediately assumed to be pedos.

            • kent_eh
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              9 months ago

              I mean just getting the electrodes on for a defibrillator you have to lift their shirt

              You also need to make sure their bra doesn’t have an underwire and remove it if there is.

          • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Even though you’re joking I wouldn’t be surprised if someone did react like that. “Uhhmmmm, that’s no CPR, you’re just fondling her! I know because I went to CPR training.”

        • Kanzar@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          32
          ·
          9 months ago

          The instructors advise you to speak aloud your actions as you do them. Also helps if you have already levelled out instructions to the rent a crowd to perform specific tasks like send for help and get the defib and you three who said yes to cpr training let’s line up and take turns doing cpr.

          …of course, the training to be comfortable giving these instructions is not really done.

          • ArbiterXero@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            9 months ago

            Absolutely!

            And what if you’re outside a bar and everyone is drunk?

            Unfortunately life doesn’t provide ideal scenarios, not to mention that under the duress of what you’re doing you may forget steps.

            I’m not saying that fondling an unconscious person is the same as cpr, but that perceptions are funny things.

        • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Then put whichever Karen looks fiercest in charge of compressions. Either she’ll get in there and do them, or she’ll demur, in which case you say you will and she should watch so she can start when you get tired. That makes her your witness. Don’t forget to tell someone else to call emergency services.

        • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          29
          ·
          9 months ago

          If you’re touching her tits, you’re not giving proper CPR. Proper CPR happens just below the sternum. That’s well below any kind of bra band. If her tits are that low, she’s either an EE cup or 80 years old.

          • dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            23
            ·
            9 months ago

            Huh, I looked it up and checked out the instructions and diagrams of several websites. Every one of them said to place your hands on the upper part of the chest and every image showed their hands between the nipples.

            • Killing_Spark@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              20
              ·
              9 months ago

              I heard the saying: if you didn’t break a rib you didn’t do CPR right. So I’m pretty sure it’s not beneath the sternum

          • hikaru755@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            9 months ago

            You need to compress the chest, so pressure needs to go on the sternum. If you’re pressing below it, the only thing you’re compressing is their intestines, which is not gonna help anyone

          • ArbiterXero@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            9 months ago

            Okay but we’ve already established that it’s not about what you ARE doing, but what people think you’re doing.

            Perception.

          • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Wouldn’t that break the xyphoid process? Below that is where you Heimlich. Above, on the strong center bone, is where you do chest compression. Also, as a haver of boobs, I can vouch that they will have enough space between them when she’s flat on her back and braless that you can put your locked fists between them on that bone and shove the heel of your hand towards the floor.

    • Zenabiz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      60
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      Understandable, but you only need to do it if there is no pulse. If you are doing chest compressions to save their life, I am sure the majority would be quite happy with not dying. You don’t need to take off their top, and you are pressing on their sternum rather than their breasts. You can’t really mistake CPR for anything else if you are doing it correctly.

        • Zenabiz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          I know, but I was just assuming chest compressions, no other tools. If you’re strapping electrodes to an unconscious person, and the machine is talking you through the CPR steps, it’s even less likely to be assumed to be anything than what it is.

      • ArbiterXero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        You can’t, that doesn’t mean that some white knight in the crowd doesn’t.

        While I agree the risk is low, it’s not zero.

        • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Youre afraid to save a persons life because there is a near zero chance that a very unlikely hypothetical situation may occur? Youre okay with letting someone die because you might get verbally chided, or worse, have someone misunderstand and be slightly rough with you? Wow.

          I honestly can’t imagine being this scared of the world.

          • ArbiterXero@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            9 months ago

            You can’t say “near zero” you don’t have the numbers.

            It depends entirely on circumstance.

            And you know that.

            But it’s wonderful that you want to judge me as a keyboard warrior. I applaud how tough you are. Have a nice day.

            • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              14
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Please, give me any numbers that show people have been harassed, threatened or injured while performing CPR on a women.

              You consider it an unlikely but possible threat. I would like to see what data informs that threat to you.

              I expect its none, and instead you just want to feel persecuted because “women standing up for themselves in modern society makes me scared, so im going to pretend thats why i wont help a women that’s dying.”

              Again, fear driven and sad.

              • ArbiterXero@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                9 months ago

                We’re both aware that the numbers don’t exist and aren’t kept.

                Suggesting that’s a fault in my argument but not yours is asking me to provide evidence to prove your point wrong. “Burden of proof” fallacy if you will.

                But that’s not the point. Plenty of people get accused of impropriety for doing less than lifting a woman’s shirt…. And if I have to apply a defibrillator, it’s not going to do much if I don’t get it under her shirt.

                We both know that reaching under her shirt can be perceived poorly especially if someone doesn’t notice the defibrillator.

                But I’ll back up my statements with references

                https://www.heart.org/en/news/2020/11/23/why-people-fear-performing-cpr-on-women-and-what-to-do-about-it

                Will you do the same? Or will you continue to ask me for information to back up your arguments?

                You made the suggestion that it was “near zero” and now you’re asking me for proof that it isn’t near zero.

                • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  Youre making the claim that there is some danger here, and your defense is “I can’t find any proof there is danger here?”

                  The simple truth is that there is no danger in this circumstance, but if you accepted that you would have no argument for not assisting a person dying.

                  Your article points to a 45%/39% male to female assistance rate. The article doesnt give exact numbers, but says some women are less likely to perform CPR on women for fear of harming them. So if we say of that 6%, 3% are women that dont perform CPR for the above, we have 3% of men who are afraid to try to save a womans life because of a non existent threat. It sounds like youre one of those 3% of fearful men.

                  Id ask for the dying womans sake, that you push past your fear and help keep another person alive. Be strong, for them. Be brave, for yourself.

                  Fear is the mindkiller. Dont let it control you. Do the right thing instead.

                  • ArbiterXero@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    Okay so you can’t see any danger in someone getting the wrong perception when I am removing parts of the shirt of an unconscious woman to put on a defibrillator? Not even if they don’t see the defibrillator?

                    You’re either not capable of understanding the point or arguing in bad faith.

                    But back to the point…. You said there was zero risk, I provided an article that showed that this isn’t just my personal feeling, but a common perception of risk, be it real or just perceived.

                    And I asked you to back up your claims, instead you double down and show nothing to support your point. You claim it is a simple truth in order to downplay your lack of data.

                    Between the mix of bad faith arguments and trying to make this personal (about whether I would act or not) you don’t seem like you’d accept a truth if it disagreed with your personal narrative. This debate seems fruitless, so I’m done. Have a nice day.

          • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Yes, I am.

            I’m not risking jail over this crap. Lost a job over it once, so I have personal, first-hand experience with the bullshit.

          • Cringe2793@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            Verbally chided? Getting sued for SA and getting your life ruined doesn’t really seem like “verbally chided”. Yeah, I’d probably let people die because my life is more important.

      • bluGill@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        9 months ago

        CPR does not save lives. It preserves a dead body until an AED or ambulance can bring it back to life. You need to remove her shirt and often bra (if there is a wire it must go, otherwise only if in the way) to use an AED so if some item of clothing is in the way don’t worry about removing it.

        Note that the above is generic CPR training that doesn’t respect local laws which can say something different.

        • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          9 months ago

          AED’s will not help someone whose heart is stopped (i.e. no pulse). They are used to shock the heart into restoring its normal rhythm. It will not start a heart that has stopped beating.

          • naqahdah@my.lserver.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            9 months ago

            Yeahhhh… and it makes me glad that the ‘A’ part in AED exists, because there are apparently a not insignificant number of people who have gotten their CPR training from TV.

        • mycorrhiza they/them@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          9 months ago

          CPR absolutely does save lives. The success rate outside hospitals is around 10%. That’s thousands of lives saved every year.

        • Sjy@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Please do not say CPR does not save lives, it 100% does. And in the United States our Good Samaritan laws protect anyone from liability if they are acting in good faith trying to help someone.

          I’m a paramedic in the United States, hold a certification as a flight medic, nothing I can bring, in a helicopter or an ambulance will do anything for anyone if high quality CPR isn’t performed.

          To break things down, yes in adults early defibrillation does make a huge difference but in kids it is literally high quality CPR that saves them. If you’d like I’d be happy to break down the details of resuscitation, but without CPR until I can get there and attempt resuscitation, then no matter how much I throw at someone to try to get their heart beating again, they’ll still be brain dead.

          • bluGill@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            My CPR instructors put it the way I wrote it to encourage us to spend more effort on getting the AED and paramedics there fast. If you do CPR before the AED/paramedics is on the way you are wasting time, but getting those has been started CPR is important. However this is clearly semantics, I think we are all in agreement that CPR is important.

            Not all states have “good Samaritan” laws. Most do, but if you live in the exception you might suffer harassment after doing CPR, including go to court - odds are the court will throw the case out, but it will still be annoying to do the right thing in those states. Though even lacking such laws, the odds that anything will happen are low.

            • Cringe2793@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Also not everyone lives in America. In more conservative places in Asia, touching a random woman (even if she is unconscious) and clearly in need of help is really asking to be judged.

              And if a video with accusatory narration is posted on tiktok or something, you’re basically done for. Especially in a small town or country. You’re basically doxxed and won’t be easily hired for work because background checks are easily done, and the company (basically the HR) isn’t going to risk the bad rep of hiring a potential molester, rapist, etc even if it’s just an accusation by random people.

            • Sjy@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Sorry forgot about this post, but it us an important topic to me. I’m only speaking for the United States All 50 states and the District of Columbia have a good Samaritan law, in addition to Federal laws for specific circumstances.

              And I agree some of this is just getting into semantics but yes get an AED if one is available, early defibrillation is without a doubt the best way to increase survival rates also activate emergency services as soon as possible there are things we carry that can help if the patient is receiving adequate CPR prior to our arrival, those steps are crucial. But ensure that you minimize any time spent not provided high quality CPR. Without blood flowing to the patients brain, it starts to die. Once the brain is dead there is nothing in modern medicine that can revive it.

              I don’t have an argument if someone is concerned about consequences for helping another person. I do what I do so I can sleep at night knowing I did what I believed was best and I did it to the best of my abilities. If I have to go to court then so be it, the bonus for me going to court is at least I’ll get to meet someone I’ve helped successfully resuscitate, that alone would make going to court worth it, independent of any verdict that is rendered. But that’s just me, I’ve had to pronounce a lot of people. I’ve had one or two go into cardiac arrest in front of my and then after treating them they talked to me during the ride to the hospital and I know I’ve had a handful of people that made a full and complete neurological recovery, but I’ve never gotten to meet any of them, which is also fine, but it would be neat to get to talk to one of them and hear their side of the experience.

      • zaph@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’m pretty sure most places in the states have laws protecting people but there have been people who were sued for giving cpr to someone who wasn’t very grateful.

    • Iheardyoubutsowhat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      If you have cpr or aed training…and a person is unconscious, consent is implied. Especially if you follow training. You felt for a pulse and/or they were not breathing, you will not get sued in this country. If someone manages to get it to court, they will lose.

      I am a certified CPR and AED , a registered WFR and just had a training class on the matter. As long as you follow proper protocol you are ok. And I’d like to add, as a man, yeah, I’d be nervous also exposing a womans chest in a crowd, people are stupid, but you can probably save a life.

    • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      If you’re doing CPR they’re effectively dead before you start. If you’re the only one there, no witnesses unless you manage to save her. If you’re not alone, you should tell them you’re going to start CPR and order them to call 911 or 999 or whatever. Or volunteer to call while they start compressions. Then you can take over/take turns and vouch for each 's intentions.

    • Emerald@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      I am hesitant to put my hands on the chest of a person who hasn’t given consent.

      • bluGill@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Someone who has no heartbeat automaticlly has given consent to receive CPR.

        • Emerald@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Not necessarily. Being unable to give consent doesn’t mean you consent. Also being dead doesn’t mean you consent either.