• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    4
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    Noone’s talking about lab creation, but rather the fact the research institution in question specializes in virology. So they would go into the field(/bat caves in this case) to collect virus samples to bring back to the lab in Wuhan to study (as that’s literally their job).

    Mistakes happen, and a researcher could have simply been infected by one of these collected samples before going onto infect other people.

    • @[email protected]M
      link
      fedilink
      6
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      In that case, I don’t see how that’s the striking condemnation of China that Western media makes the lab theory out to be. The virus is still of entirely natural origin, and it was spread inadvertently. Maybe in that case you could make the argument that the lab and/or the workers responsible should bear responsibility and that it was negligence as opposed to a freak accident, but usually when Westerners talk about the lab theory they think “China was researching COVID specifically to destroy the world REEEEE”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        113 years ago

        I don’t think China would intentionally spread COVID as a weapon, and not necessarily because they are so nice.

        Simply,

        • COVID, for a very long time, spread in China mostly. Who wants to attack themselves?
        • COVID has a pretty low risk of death for a weapon
        • It’s risky as fuck. Imagine if people find out, and say the US goes to war about it (the US had started wars for much smaller things in the past). That war’s not gonna be pleasant to say the least.

        So, It just sounds like a stupid thing to do.

      • poVoq
        link
        fedilink
        63 years ago

        The condemnation comes from what people assume the researchers did with the virus after it arrived in the lab. Somehow it had to make the jump to humans and human to human transmission, which is far from trivial.

        Based on what western labs commonly did in the past (see where this goes?), they might have intentionally done some virus breeding to see what it would take for it to make this jump. From a research perspective this somewhat makes sense, but given the risk of a lab leak this is relatively unethical IMHO (and at least officially western labs stopped doing that).

        But personally I find this entire discussion completely useless. Even if it turns out to be a lab leak, so what? Does that change anything about the current situation and further outlook?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          23 years ago

          I agree with that logically it’s not beneficial but the USA is openly practicing jingoism against the Chinese to the point that Asian Americans are being randomly attacked. There’s a theory this leads to a demand for reparations which leads to an excuse for WW3, which some american war hawks are looking for.

        • @[email protected]M
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          3 years ago

          Somehow it had to make the jump to humans and human to human transmission

          Could the fact that it could naturally infect humans not be the reason they were studying it? I mean, we only have circumstantial evidence for a lab leak so it seems like jumping the gun to try and come up with theories on the details anyway.

          • poVoq
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            3 years ago

            Maybe for the first part, i.e. some animal viruses have the ability to infect humans, but usually lack sufficient capabilities to then go on to infect other humans from a human host.

            Edit: I am not saying this was done in a lab. It can happen naturally as well, for example this happened with the swine-flu. But it usually requires prolonged and wide-spread close contact between humans and these animals, which is unlikely in the case of cave bats.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -3
            edit-2
            3 years ago

            No, I think there are things to criticize about NATO, but not that it’s furthering white supremacy or that NATO and member countries are neo nazis and all that nonsense. I’m for example critical of NATO’s (And Russia/China’s) training demonstrations that are upping conflict or taking in eastern countries that don’t historically would be a part of NATO that also makes Russia more volatile

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              33 years ago

              It’s objectively a club of exclusively majority white nations (+ Turkey) using their military to bomb non-white dominant nations for the past 60 years. Many of their countries have or have had far right political parties (Poland, Greece, USA, etc.) in political power during its tenure. How are you not seeing this as a white supremacist organization? Do you actually take what they say at face value?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                -73 years ago

                Because I’m a part of society and meet normal human beings, I follow normal news and I know the historical context. Even calling all these countries ‘white’ seems to have a very American sensibillity. Neo nazis in europe would not include most of these countries.

                And a lot of you people (tankie scum) defend authoritarian countries anway. Why throw rocks from a glass house, you know?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  53 years ago

                  Why do you continuously use the insult that you’re “normal” or follow “normal things” compared to everyone with opposing views to you who are apparently all weirdos or shut-ins?

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    13 years ago

                    Well, there are stuff that are dissagreements, but some opinions and positions is most likely fitting a certain lifesetting. Like take for example neo nazis

                • @[email protected]M
                  link
                  fedilink
                  13 years ago

                  So basically you’re insinuating that the Western liberal point of view is “normal” for “humans”? That we’re all insane for daring to having dissenting opinions? Hmm…

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -23 years ago

                    Well, there are stuff that are disagreements and stuff that are off base. You wouldn’t take neo nazi conspiracies seriously either.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -13 years ago

                    I mean, I could talk with you over Jitsi. try telling me all this stuff to my face. I like to see how are then

        • @[email protected]M
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          3 years ago

          Because I’ve heard all the arguments the West has against them, and they’re all either without sufficient evidence or blatantly false.

          You’ve probably seen these debunk lists floating around this site, maybe even posted by me, in case you haven’t, bam and bam.