cheese_greater@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · edit-22 days agoDo you ever revise your upvotes for a particular sub-thread/conversant when you get the sense they are either bad-faith or do not have sufficient knowledge to justify their participation or comments?message-squaremessage-square20linkfedilinkarrow-up172arrow-down13
arrow-up169arrow-down1message-squareDo you ever revise your upvotes for a particular sub-thread/conversant when you get the sense they are either bad-faith or do not have sufficient knowledge to justify their participation or comments?cheese_greater@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · edit-22 days agomessage-square20linkfedilink
minus-squareArkoudalinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 day agoNo because when I upvote someone it usually means I agree with their point. Disagreeing later doesn’t change the initial agreement.
minus-squarecheese_greater@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·edit-21 day agoEven if it was manipulative or disingenuous?
minus-squareArkoudalinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 day agoIf I agree with their point, again, I don’t care if I later find reasons or points to disagree on something different. It will not make me waste my time adjusting upvotes. Common ground is very important.
No because when I upvote someone it usually means I agree with their point. Disagreeing later doesn’t change the initial agreement.
Even if it was manipulative or disingenuous?
If I agree with their point, again, I don’t care if I later find reasons or points to disagree on something different. It will not make me waste my time adjusting upvotes. Common ground is very important.