Nowadays everybody wants to talk like they got something to say but nothing comes out when they move their lips just a bunch of gibberish.

  • 10 Posts
  • 358 Comments
Joined 6 months ago
cake
Cake day: May 28th, 2024

help-circle
  • Don’t get it twisted, humanity is in decline. The evidence is abundant and apparent. But that does not mean we are in “the end times” of our species.

    The most likely thing to happen is another round of eat the rich followed by a good idea to move forward with that will eventually bloat to the point of collapse. Rinse and repeat.

    The rise of Fascism is just the last stop before the Train turns around.



  • First of all I would argue that the difference between a “quirk” and a mental illness is whether it messes with your life, and pedophilia very much does - in that sense a sexuality can be a mental illness if it interferes with your mental wellbeing.

    Being gay often messes with ones life and mental health. Is homosexuality a mental illness?

    Secondarily would say that whether pedophilia can be “cured” through therapy - making it a mental illness in your definition - or it can only be mitigated, is something that therapists know and I don’t.

    There is treatment, ranging from Drug to Behavioral therapies, and from what I can find they are pretty effective.

    My “definition” does not involve “curing” anything. I said treatment can lead to positive outcomes, not that it will. Plenty of known mental illness’ and disorders have terrible outcomes with or without treatment.

    The point is pedophilia is either a sexuality or a disorder and it cannot exist as both.

    Regardless, it makes no difference towards the point I was trying to make: people who suffer from it should not be stigmatised because of it, as it makes it harder and scarier for them to seek help

    If what you are trying to say is “Pedophilia should be de-stigmatized in order to see more people seek help and have better outcomes.” then simply say that.

    Pedophiles need help before they hurt someone. Accepting Pedophiles for being Pedophiles and normalizing the behavior in anyway is not the way to go about it because it is not normal behavior.

    It is not my responsibility to accept them for who they are as a prerequisite to them seeking help.

    I do not care how “hard” or “scary” it is to seek help in the current climate. It is their responsibility, and only their responsibility, to deal with their issues before something bad happens.


  • The core issue in your argument is being unable to define pedophilia as either a sexuality or a mental disorder.

    Either pedophilia is an inherent part of a persons sexual identity that is uncontrollable and unable to be changed, or it is a disorder that requires treatment which can lead to beneficial outcomes for the individual.

    It cannot be both.





  • Victimless crimes are not crimes. Thus producing any pornography is a crime only when it involves violating someone’s rights.

    You mean like when someone takes a photo of a minor, removes their clothing to make a sexually explicit image, and uses that image to harass, bully, and extort?

    Ah, so you are dumb enough to think it’s bad to defend pedophiles who have not committed a crime against a real person?

    Taking a picture of a minor, making that image sexually explicit, and using it to harass, bully, and extort that minor is not a “crime against a real person”?

    Damn right, I am defending pedophiles who are being persecuted for being born with that deviation alone. I am also defending pedophiles who satisfy that via any means not harming real people. I will do both till my last breath.

    You should stop “defending” their “right” to child pornography and start advocating for them to get real help with the very serious mental disorder that causes them to want sexual activity with a minor instead.

    If you argument is that they are disgusting and you don’t want them in society, then so are you.

    My argument is that they should not be given child pornography. Your argument is that they should.

    The disgusting people I don’t want in society are people who use child pornography, and those who defend their use of child pornography.

    Kindly see yourself out and take the rest with you.



  • What this conversation is about has as much to do with child pornography as hentai with loli characters.

    Creating sexually explicit images of minors is child pornography.

    You just can’t argue without unsubstantiated accusations, can you?

    You literally confirmed my claim in your first sentence, and your last.

    When real living people are being murdered and abused in droves, you are still worried more about glorified automated Photoshop and accusing its users of being the same as actual rapists.

    Production of child pornography is production of child pornography. It does not need to involve rape. Producing child pornography is a separate crime.

    Its users are pedophiles because they are producing child pornography. You are defending them.

    These are the facts.


  • This type of leadership is not likely to change after an election win.

    We know exactly how Pierre plans to run the country because we already had Harper as PM. It will be the same if Pierre becomes PM.

    There really isn’t a solid strategy against what the Conservatives are doing outside of passing legislation that helps the problems they keep parroting and communicating what is happening clearly to the population.

    One half of the strategy is being blocked by the Conservatives in the house as they tie up proceedings with privilege debates, and the other half is a serious weak spot with the Liberals in general as they don’t seem to know how to communicate effectively.

    We will see how effective the strategy Conservatives are using post federal election because as it stands we cannot really say it is effective when the Conservatives are the only party campaigning making polling numbers lean dramatically one way.