After more than 32,000 speeding tickets were handed out in just three weeks by new automated speed enforcement cameras in community safety zones, council in the City of Vaughan decided to pause the program.

Mayor Steven Del Duca put forward the motion last week to pause the tickets until September, when council is due to receive a report from staff on ways the city can create more effective signage about the presence of cameras.

  • Mycatiskai
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Ding Ding Ding.

    If they had given council members a device to shut off the cameras for themselves and rich donors then they wouldn’t have shut it down.

    Maybe they should consider changing the speed limits a bit.

    • Nik282000
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 minutes ago

      Maybe they should consider changing the speed limits a bit.

      Or, hear me out, people could make the needle on their dash point at the same number as the one printed on the giant white signs all over.

    • NarrativeBear@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      The solution is better road-way design and classifications.

      Changing a speed limit sign on a roadway does not change the roadways “designed” or “perceived” speed limit.

      When changing signage, the roadway also need to change.

      Example, you can’t increase the signed speed limit to 100 kph on a residential street without first a complete redesign of said street into a hwy. This is done by removing driveways, speedbumps, crosswalks, stop signs, and roundabouts. Without this redesign of the roadway this residential street would not make a really good hwy. The exact reverse is true. A hwy does not make a good residential street.

      • healthetank
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        People always say that, and while yes it is true that wider lanes, less intersections, and less roadside hazards do make the road feel like you can speed, use your goddamn speedometer.

        People are thinking breathing creatures. Idgaf if the road feels like I could go 100km/hr, if the sign says 50, I’m not flying at 100 down the road because I can think and be aware. At the end of the day, speeding is a CHOICE. Road design can make it feel slow or painful to do the speed limit, but if you can’t override that feeling and pay attention while driving, you don’t deserve a license.

        • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          We need a mix of both. Yes people should be following the rules, but the truth is some people don’t and with how normalized driving is, testing standards are pretty relaxed. Most people were tested as teenagers and now just rely on getting tickets to keep us in line, meanwhile many trades and certificates require retesting to stay valid. It would be horrendously expensive to retest drivers, but i think regular retesting should be done and the bill should be paid for by the drivers.

          Currently it feels just as safe to do 80 in most 60 zones. Changing the design to make speeding feel more risky and feel unsafe will reduce speeding and let people rely less on their speedometers.

          My coworker doesn’t like to speed. His new van doesn’t have cruise control. The 10 speed automatic transmission can let you creep from 100 to 115/120 pretty easily and relatively unnoticeably on an empty road. He complains how half his time driving hes constantly checking the speedometer and feels he is paying less attention to the roadway because of that. This issue isn’t as simple as check the speedometer more often. Vehicle and roadway design plays a factor as well.