Should have been a complete rejection, but I’ll take it

  • corsicanguppy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    You can’t advocate for the separation of church and state and still decide churches are Republican tools. upholding the law as written now means they must respect that tax scam churches have; and work towards re-examining it methodically.

    Unilaterally deciding to change the tax code because it would fit their political agenda is more a Republican thing.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Sorry… but… uhm… what?

      Giving tax breaks to churches- especially churches that violate regulations on 501c(3) corps by engaging in political activity and endorsing candidates- is somehow failing to uphold the separation of church and state?

      I don’t see that argument as even making sense.