☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Economics@lemmy.mlEnglish · 10 days agoChina lost about 100 billionaires last year, according to UBS, accounting for a 20% net decline in Chinese billionaires' aggregate wealth, while billionaire wealth in the US continues to surgelemmy.mlimagemessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up119arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up119arrow-down1imageChina lost about 100 billionaires last year, according to UBS, accounting for a 20% net decline in Chinese billionaires' aggregate wealth, while billionaire wealth in the US continues to surgelemmy.ml☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Economics@lemmy.mlEnglish · 10 days agomessage-square8fedilinkfile-text
https://inequality.org/facts/global-inequality/ https://www.oxfam.org/en/press-releases/billionaire-wealth-surges-2-trillion-2024-three-times-faster-year-while-number
minus-squarePyr_Pressurelinkfedilinkarrow-up4·10 days agoIs the number of billionaires something to be proud of?
minus-square☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·10 days agoIt’s not, and that’s why China shedding billionaires is a good thing.
Is the number of billionaires something to be proud of?
It’s not, and that’s why China shedding billionaires is a good thing.
If you’re a billionaire, probably