They celebrate the general that survived the battles he directed … no one ever counts the dead that piled up in order to achieve victory on the battle field … no one except the families left behind.
A quick check of wiki suggests that the Scheldt was taken, but at unnecessary cost, at least in part because Simonds thought a much smaller force than was needed was capable of taking the region. Allied brass quarreling over objectives seems to have been a contributing factor as well.
I was referring to the Second World War … but the first world war was a weird bit of history, the more I read about it, the more confused I become as to why in the hell that conflict was even started. It reads more like a bar fight that went horribly out of control and lasted for four years and killed 20 million people for no apparent real reason … which then laid the foundation for another more horrible war after.
I’m Indigenous Canadian and I’m probably the first fully English speaking generation in my family. My grandfather was recruited into this war after being told he had to help his king and that he would be rewarded for it all. He left the country to go to England for two years, worked like a dog in the Forestry Corp (thankfully never fought in the front lines), came home and never received a penny. He was as poor when he came home as when he left and no one cared. He and our entire family have also never understood why he even fought in that war. As much reading as I’ve done about that war … I still don’t understand exactly why so many people had to fight and die for such arcane, questionable and stupid reasons.
BTW … I love all the references to Black Adder (that is the show right?) and Rowan Atkinson and Stephen Fry … I really have to take time to watch that show
Ah, goes to show I don’t know my modern European battles very well. >.>
but the first world war was a weird bit of history, the more I read about it, the more confused I become as to why in the hell that conflict was even started. It reads more like a bar fight that went horribly out of control and lasted for four years and killed 20 million people for no apparent real reason … which then laid the foundation for another more horrible war after.
Yeah, more or less. Best summary would be:
Europe tries to make massive alliances for deterrence, under the understandable reasoning that no one wants to fight a stronger opponent than themselves
Alliances become so massive and entangled that one country (Austro-Hungary) deciding to start an armed conflict with a smaller country (Serbia), drags every other country into the conflict
Countries aren’t always rational actors, and even when they are, placing bets on being able to force a fait accompli before consequences hit (a la Russia with Crimea in 2014) is always a risk.
You can also apportion some blame to Kaiser Wilhelm II for being such a dumbass as to give a metaphorical blank check to Austro-Hungary so he could sound big and strong in support of Germany’s allies on the world stage. He had a lot of mommy and daddy issues. Thanks, monarchy.
It was said, early on, when the opening moves were being played and diplomatic avenues were still being tried, that in Austro-Hungary, the mood was that the war was inevitable but not serious, while in Germany, the mood was that the war was serious but not inevitable.
BTW … I love all the references to Black Adder (that is the show right?) and Rowan Atkinson and Stephen Fry … I really have to take time to watch that show
Oh, yes, the whole show is fantastic! Especially the last season.
Guy Simonds, Canadian general who led the Canadian forces in the battle of the scheldt in Belgium.
Basically just threw young inexperienced Canadian soldiers against battle hardened Germans until they literally ran out of soldiers.
He was celebrated because he let so many young Canadians die unnecessarily.
I know the story because I have a relative that survived that battle and another that died there.
Celebrated by who? The Germans? Why would Canadians celebrate a general killing all their kids?
They celebrate the general that survived the battles he directed … no one ever counts the dead that piled up in order to achieve victory on the battle field … no one except the families left behind.
Did he win the battle? Generals usually aren’t celebrated just for surviving, at least not in the USA. It’s not difficult to survive as a general.
A quick check of wiki suggests that the Scheldt was taken, but at unnecessary cost, at least in part because Simonds thought a much smaller force than was needed was capable of taking the region. Allied brass quarreling over objectives seems to have been a contributing factor as well.
Ah, a tale as old as Armies.
Directed according to the grand plan!
What a shitshow WW1 was.
I was referring to the Second World War … but the first world war was a weird bit of history, the more I read about it, the more confused I become as to why in the hell that conflict was even started. It reads more like a bar fight that went horribly out of control and lasted for four years and killed 20 million people for no apparent real reason … which then laid the foundation for another more horrible war after.
I’m Indigenous Canadian and I’m probably the first fully English speaking generation in my family. My grandfather was recruited into this war after being told he had to help his king and that he would be rewarded for it all. He left the country to go to England for two years, worked like a dog in the Forestry Corp (thankfully never fought in the front lines), came home and never received a penny. He was as poor when he came home as when he left and no one cared. He and our entire family have also never understood why he even fought in that war. As much reading as I’ve done about that war … I still don’t understand exactly why so many people had to fight and die for such arcane, questionable and stupid reasons.
BTW … I love all the references to Black Adder (that is the show right?) and Rowan Atkinson and Stephen Fry … I really have to take time to watch that show
Ah, goes to show I don’t know my modern European battles very well. >.>
Yeah, more or less. Best summary would be:
Countries aren’t always rational actors, and even when they are, placing bets on being able to force a fait accompli before consequences hit (a la Russia with Crimea in 2014) is always a risk.
You can also apportion some blame to Kaiser Wilhelm II for being such a dumbass as to give a metaphorical blank check to Austro-Hungary so he could sound big and strong in support of Germany’s allies on the world stage. He had a lot of mommy and daddy issues. Thanks, monarchy.
It was said, early on, when the opening moves were being played and diplomatic avenues were still being tried, that in Austro-Hungary, the mood was that the war was inevitable but not serious, while in Germany, the mood was that the war was serious but not inevitable.
Oh, yes, the whole show is fantastic! Especially the last season.
Of all the reading I’ve done so far … here’s my favourite summary of the First World War
https://stephaniehuesler.com/2019/12/15/history-undusted-if-world-war-i-were-a-bar-fight/