Yeah, took me a hot minute.

It might have been obvious to you but it took me a minute to notice.

For those who didn’t notice, there’s a swastika hidden in the $

the yellow-orange colour represents gold, an obsession with material goods. I think it makes sense personally.

Whether right wing people would censor the image or not is up to what right wing people think.

Awesome protest, but I’m not sure about the blurb ontop.

Do right-wing people deny that trans women can have breasts? I don’t believe that is true in general. And do public decency laws specify that breasts can’t be shown, or women can’t show nipples?

I don’t like using country flags for languages. For one thing, not every language has a country of its own – there are 700+ languages in use today, but <200 countries. Many languages don’t even have any obvious insignia to represent them at all.

If you’re making a piece of software and you want it ported to many languages, just use text to represent the language.

No, that’s not it. I am not denying that there is constructive and high-effort activity on the instance. But the moment-to-moment conversation is superlatively hostile, (at least when I show up lol), and I’m making pretty tame comments – it’s not because of me. I don’t anywhere near that amount of venom in other instances.

Yeah that’s basically my feelings too. I wonder why they are so defensive. (edit: /gen)

As I recall, the mathematical definition of accuracy does have some overlap with precision, so increasing precision improves accuracy as well. It’s just a little confusing.

Well I’m not claiming that an AI-apocalypse is inevitable, just that it’s possible enough we should start worrying about it now. As for the reason to believe it would happen – isn’t that covered by (2)? If you believe that (2) will occur with near-100% certainty, then that would be the impetus.

2.5356%.

clever. (But is that accurate?)

I don’t entirely agree with that image – the first one says low accuracy, low precision – but it’s the best accuracy possible given the low precision.

Oh I see, didn’t realize this is what it was. Honestly that’s so much worse than what I was thinking.

I liked the first few minutes of Picard but nothing after.

I don’t really know how to do that other than to dig through replies from hexbear users pointing out how much vitriol they use. But in general, there’s a lot of name-calling (e.g. since you disagree with me, you must be a “white cracker,” “minstrel,” etc. – wtf kind of problem these guys have with minstrels I don’t understand); a lot of posting of flippant reaction images instead of actual responses, and so on. They’re clearly very angry about politics, which I get, but also have no interest in actually debating politics with any level of subtlety; even when I agree with someone in broad strokes but disagree about a particular item because I think it’s counter-productive to their own cause, I just get harshly told off. As a result, I can only assume they imagine everyone else is disingenuous.

Ah – I was being sarcastic when I said “if we bully him enough, the genocide will stop.” Perhaps I should have added /s.

Depends on the meaning of “accurate” (e.g. an archer, a research paper, a copy…).

Impeccable; flawless; dead-on; faithful – if I had to choose one, I’d pick “impeccable”

I think one encounter with hexbear is going to inform most users better than any third-party warning.

I align more closely with hexbear politics than almost all non-hexbear users. IMO, their politics is not the problem – they’re just an astoundingly toxic community.

Don’t say “very accurate,” say “exact”

“exact” is a synonym for “very precise,” not “very accurate.”