This didn’t work in Canada. That is the carbon pricing system we have and still the opposing party has made it so unpopular every party has said they will remove the system in the next election.

Despite lots of evidence that the carbon pricing system we have was a net positive for most Canadians, people still are convinced it’s the cause of inflation.

What is considered an unnecessary expansion? Is this just when they add more variety of classes or start teaching new programs that there weren’t enough people to support before?

I think uptime Kuma can be configured to look for expiring certs

Oh Absolutely, it’s going to be a rough few years I worry.

I only brought it up because the economy is complicated, and most consumers don’t understand what causes prices to increase, when then leads them to vote against their own interests.

I figure he best I can do is try to educate people where I can.

The list of items Canada is adding a tarrifs to has also been released https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canada-retaliatory-tariffs-united-states-trump-1.7448559

I only asked my question because the original commentor was suggesting that US prices were going to go up because Canada was adding export tarrifs.

I assume that because they deleted their comment they realized that wasn’t true.

Are the egg prices being high caused by inflation? I thought it was the bird flu outbreak that the USA has been struggling to control over the last 3 or 4 years.

Which products is Canada putting an export tarrif on? This is news to me.

What is aegis in this case? (It’s way too generic to successfully search for)

So if I’m following this correctly. The US government gave TikTok a year to sell their US operations, they did not and were blocked. Trump came in and gave them a 3 month grace period, to allow them the opportunity to sell their US operations again…

Why does he expect this is going to go differently? TikTok already showed they would rather go dark than sell.

When I click the static image it opens and plays as a gif.

It feels like OP based the post title off something other than the video they shared…

deleted by creator

One thing to consider with NFS is how stable your network is.

I’ve moved away from storing application files on my NAS and instead I store them locally where I run the application.

For things like jellyfin media or paperless files they can stay on the NAS and be accessed via NFS, but the config, db and other files the apps create as part of their operation, things can get into a bad state if the network drops at an unexpected time.

Instead I setup backup cronjobs that backup those files to the NAS nightly.

I agree with the other commenters regarding using the NFS share mounting right in docker compose. It does work great once you get it working.

deleted by creator

Honestly I make the same assumption about a lot of his positions. Much of what he says or suggests policy wise doesn’t hold up if you dig into it. So why say it in the first place?

Most of the platform is being built on people being angry and not understanding the systems that are being talked about.

From that perspective it makes sense that they need to continue to feed lies, half-truths and other nonsense to keep people angry.

My assumption is that this angle is the easiest to get people to be angry about. Most of his platform is getting people angry about things that don’t exist or excited about solutions that won’t solve anything. IMO getting people to be angry about a leadership change is more of the same.

deleted by creator

It could also be that they were dependent on subsidised oil imports from Venezuela but over the last year Venezuela has drastically reduced how much oil it’s sending.

On one hand I think it’s ok for rental prices to go up as device prices increase. But that should never happen after a customer has a device, at that point the device price was already locked in. If they rent an additional device? Sure that one could cost more, but not the existing ones

Honestly I would love to see laws that make rental units without the option to purchase illegal. (With appropriate limits on how much the purchase option costs)