• 0 Posts
  • 51 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: December 19th, 2023

help-circle

  • I was thinking like this a few weeks ago but with more thought I think we are geographically too difficult to invade by force.

    It’s unfortunately much the opposite; our geography makes us easy to divide and conquer through a combination of the Canadian Shield being difficult to develop on, and the Trans Canada highway being a single point of failure.

    https://youtu.be/550EdfxN868

    I know the video is about invading the US, but it covers the general strategy the US could easily use to prevent troop movements between the western and eastern parts of Canada.

    The rest of the world would also have boots on the ground here to help us out.

    The US Navy could easily blockade or destroy the entirety of Europe’s combined naval forces in a matter of days. Large-scale troop and equipment transport to bring reinforcement would be extremely unlikely to work, and Europe’s militaries know this.

    Also I think the vast majority of Americans would just refuse the order to do it.

    20 years ago, Ukrainians would never have entertained the idea that Russia would invade and annex them. Many families lived, and continue to live, across both countries. Pernicious propaganda combined with authoritarian rule eventually removed the risk of sufficiently organized opposition.

    Will it take 20 years for the US oligarchy to do the same? It’s only been two months and we’ve gone from mutual cooperation to booing each other’s anthems in sports games and AI-generated pictures of geese smashing eagles.

    Increased trade with China at the US’ expense will be the grain of truth buried in Trump’s lies about Canada being owned and run by China (it doesn’t need to be true, he just needs a fact he can grossly misinterpret, and often, not even that).

    I wouldn’t underestimate just how thoroughly ignorant and upset many Americans are. A little push in the right direction and the promise of wealth, even if ill-gotten, might be all they need.













  • “American fascism is entirely due to Russian operatives and trolls” is laughable because of how hard it glosses over the steps you have taken to ensure fascism in your own country.

    I’m not American, and it’s not fascist thinking to point out the fact that Russia is literally running a fascist playbook to encourage aligned fascism globally.

    Pointing that out isn’t meant to excuse the existence of fascists within the US; if anything, its about the idea that there are fascists to work with in every country, and they’re coordinating their efforts.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Democracy_Union

    The difference between the US and Russia is there are still people like the head of the FTC trying to curtail corporate power however they can. Russia only does it to enforce loyalty amongst its oligarchs.

    This idea that Russia is both too weak to win a war against Ukraine but also strong enough to covertly topple the world’s foremost superpowers is honestly fascist thinking.

    The too weak/strong argument is fallacious in this instance because the dimensions we’re comparing aren’t equivalent. A nation that heavily invests in intelligence and asymmetric warfare at the expense of conventional warfare capabilities will be strong in the former and weak in the latter. In Ukraine’s case, Russia thought they were strong in both and found out that they weren’t quite as capable as they had led themselves to believe. That’s why we’re seeing them ramp up the tactics as described in the article.

    Once Trump pulls the plug on Ukraine’s funding and access to US intelligence systems, they’ll fall to Russia because they won’t have enough of either capability to win a war of attrition with a larger, richer state.