That’s still from March 9th. Things are changing fast.
- 3 Posts
- 664 Comments
RagingNerdoholictoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.world•Banning masks means banning (a subset) of disabled people from public places without great risk to their healthEnglish62·5 months agoAh yes, certainly this will never ever be abused by law enforcement ever.
RagingNerdoholictoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.world•Banning masks means banning (a subset) of disabled people from public places without great risk to their healthEnglish6·5 months agoGovernment: “wear a mask to protect others”
Conservatives: “Nuh uh! You can’t tell me what to do! Hurr durr honk honk muh freedumbs!!”
Government: “wearing a mask is strictly prohibited”
Conservatives: “As you wish, my sire, whose boot shall I lick?”
RagingNerdoholictoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.world•Banning masks means banning (a subset) of disabled people from public places without great risk to their healthEnglish161·5 months agoIt’s important to note that the mask is far more effective in stopping the wearer from transmitting a virus than it is in stopping the wearer from contracting a virus.
While this is generally true, I’d be remiss if I didn’t point out that a properly-fitted respirator provides very good protection. Even more so if it’s an elastomeric with P100 filters (99.97% PFE with absurdly high fit factors).
But…
You’re absolutely right, if everyone would consistently wear at least an earloop respirator like a KF94 or KN95 — even if the quality is a bit sketchy and even if the fit is less than ideal — that would cut down on viral particulate emissions a great deal and task your own respirator with orders of magnitude less particulate to filter out.
RagingNerdoholictoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.world•Capitalism prioritises investment based on profit, not based on goodEnglish33·5 months agoJust saying, “it’s capitalism’s fault,” is not entirely incorrect, but it is definitely oversimplifying. Chronic diseases are complex, incredibly challenging to solve, and can vary a great degree by individual.
The government gave the NIH a billion dollars to study long COVID and the result … fuck-all. Literally all they did was loosely define some things that the enormous and growing patient community already knew. No treatments, no diagnostics, nothing.
To be clear, capitalism certainly plays a substantially antagonistic role in solving chronic illness, but just throwing money at a problem doesn’t solve it either.
RagingNerdoholictoUnited States | News & Politics@lemmy.ml•Luigi's ManifestoEnglish1151·5 months ago[indecipherable] is the new [redacted]
RagingNerdoholicto Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.net•Car tires shed a quarter of all microplastics in the environment. Urgent action is neededEnglish141·5 months agoThere’s no such thing as an “electric car tire.” They just use standard passenger vehicle tires rated for the appropriate weight class.
“Tougher” just means they handle more weight by holding higher air pressure, so they’ll have more layers of steel, kevlar, canvas, etc. The materials that makes contact with the road still wear the same.
RagingNerdoholicto Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.net•Car tires shed a quarter of all microplastics in the environment. Urgent action is neededEnglish3·5 months agoI know motorcycle tires need replacing fairly frequently, but I had no idea it was a racket. Although, I’d think they’d generally need to be softer for maximum traction on two wheels.
RagingNerdoholicto Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.net•Car tires shed a quarter of all microplastics in the environment. Urgent action is neededEnglish2·5 months agoIs it not because they have so little contact area compared to passenger vehicle tires?
RagingNerdoholicto Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.net•Car tires shed a quarter of all microplastics in the environment. Urgent action is neededEnglish1·5 months agoThey’re not prototypes, they exist and they’re called tweels. They’re only really useful for low-speed industrial equipment where ride quality is a low priority.
RagingNerdoholicto Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.net•Car tires shed a quarter of all microplastics in the environment. Urgent action is neededEnglish596·5 months agoI’ve been saying this for a while. Not only that, but electric cars are substantially heavier than their ICE-powered equivalents, meaning both tires and roads wear out more quickly. Plus, there’s a ton of pollution and other environmental damage caused by battery production that at least partly offsets the lack of tailpipe emissions.
As loathe as I am to admit, because I’m a car enthusiast and I enjoy driving, cars cannot be the default mode of transportation everywhere indefinitely; they will always need to exist, but should mostly be for small centres with no capacity to implement transit infrastructure and last mile type of things.
RagingNerdoholicto No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•Does anyone else think the NYPD photos of the UHC CEO shooting suspect don’t match?English101·5 months agoIsn’t your “phone call” a Hollywood trope? It’s not like you get to gamble on the highest stakes call of your life (oops, line’s busy or you misdialed or whatever), but you only get one chance like it’s some legal gotcha the cops can pull on a suspect.
If you actually believe what the worm brain is saying, I’ve got a bridge to sell you.
That has to be the most charitable interpretation possible of the incoming fascist government’s intent. It’s literally just slave labour with extra steps.
RagingNerdoholicto People Twitter@sh.itjust.works•Conservative parent is sad his daughters aren't coming for thanksgiving after voting for TrumpEnglish95·5 months agoWell, golly gee, he “let” his independent, grown-ass adult offspring vote for the candidate of their own choosing. I can’t imagine why they’d spurn him after such selfless and generous act.
This. It’s a wilfully deceptive statistical misinterpretation implying that a woman working alongside a man in the same job is magically making 20-something percent less. If businesses could get away with saving 20-30% on their biggest ongoing expense (payroll) for employees in one half of the population, they would only ever hire people from that half.
When controlled for field, role, seniority, region, etc., the disparity is within a margin of error.
Where are you seeing this?
I took this screenshot from 338 Canada five seconds ago: