If someone does something psychotic a lot, does that make it ethical for someone-else to do it even once?
If someone does something psychotic a lot, does that make it ethical for someone-else to do it even once?
“should [be] emulated” or “should [have been immo]lated”?
LA county is the 2nd biggest oil producer in California, California is 12th biggest oil producer in the USA, the USA is the biggest oil producer in the world.
Face, meet leopard.
Kumbh Mela deaths:
https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/maha-kumbh-mela-stampede-up-prayagraj-stampede-injury-2671695-2025-01-29 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_human_stampedes_in_Hindu_temples
That’s just Kumbh Mela. Last year at Hathras
When I did a search for “what happens after death” with double quotes at google.com and at google.co.in, the 1st 2 sentences at the top of the page was a quote from an article at Psychology Today mentioning the superstitious idea of heaven:
deleted by creator
I like silly puns, but wouldn’t say it to someone like a waiter who’s time I might be wasting and who may feel the need to pretend to like the joke because they need tips.
It’s possible the waiter might enjoy it, since it’s a job that attracts extraverts, but I couldn’t be sure because in some places they’re supposed to kiss even the asshole customers’ asses. Same reason I ask friends not to flirt with servers - because they’re usually not allowed to tell the flirter to stop, and some depend on tips.
84% of Pakistanis wanted Sharia to be the law of the land, and of those 76% wanted the death penalty for anyone who leaves Islam (Pew 2013).
It’s a death cult.
More likely to be local phenomena than stars, because non-polar stars won’t stay in view of a stationary telescope due to diurnal motion.
Please elide the emojis, they’re jarring.
“55 percent of Americans either strongly or somewhat support such mass deportations [of] [everyone living in the United States without authorization.]”
"a large majority is sympathetic to efforts to strictly limit how doctors can treat children struggling with their gender identity […] Seventy-one percent said that no one under 18 should be prescribed puberty-blocking drugs or hormones. "
You failed to explain how you plan to abolish the two party system that makes voting “green” unviable in the US.
There are enough people who couldn’t stomach voting for the Rs or Ds, to vote for another party that wants to reverse instead of accelerate anthropogenic climate change. See post you replied to:
In 2020 Biden got 81 million votes, Trump 74 million. 84 million didn’t vote - if they voted Green to reverse anthropogenic climate change, they could’ve gotten a non-omnicidal president, won the house, and a third of the senate.
Not to mention Jill Stiens [sic] ties to Putin.
If Stein is tied to Putin, then another 3rd party should get people’s votes instead - the smaller parties have less ballot access, requiring more write-in votes. What are Stein’s connections? Seems like the SIC’s report doesn’t make it clear what she did wrong.
It’s not only Republicans voting to have their faces eaten, per the definition of this community: https://lemmy.world/post/21640658
Democrats constantly vote to make the biosphere unlivable as shown by how their actions are accelerating anthropogenic climate: like the US producing more oil under Biden than under Trump. Cue surprised Pikachu when their houses burn down due to record heat, record wind storms, record fires which climate scientists have been warning about for decades now.
You can vote for the omnicidal Democrats who supply weapons to genocidal governments, or vote for the omnicidal Republicans who are worse than the Democrats, or you can vote to reverse climate change. In 2020 Biden got 81 million votes, Trump 74 million. 84 million didn’t vote - if they voted Green to reverse anthropogenic climate change, they could’ve gotten a non-omnicidal president, won the house, and a third of the senate.
71.0% of voters in LA county voted for Biden, and 26.9% voted for Trump in 2020.
Under Biden, oil production hit a new record high, beating even Trump’s record.
So instead of voting Green to reverse anthropogenic climate change, the vast majority instead voted for parties that accelerate it.
The role of climate change in the catastrophic 2025 Los Angeles fires.
Thanks. I’d only been looking at the “x Posts” and “x Comments” 3 lines above that.
I’m not sure Canadians would want the 6 million Californians who voted for Trump (more than 38% of the voters in the state); or the 3.5 million New Yorkers who voted for Trump (42.7%). Maybe leave the mostly rural areas of the Dem states for Trumpistan?
Also the included states have a larger population than Canada, so it would be Canada joining the Dem states - which I can’t see any sane 1st-world country doing.
Letting the Trump states become a country, and the Dem states (sans rural areas) become a different country, seems like it would make both groups vastly happier; tho it would require allowing at least a few years for people to swap states.
Maybe if enough people stop tipping, workers will go work at places where they’re paid enough so they don’t need tips to survive? Horrific for the poor until tips-to-survive ends tho.
Voting against parties that make laws propping up an economic system that rewards psychopathy and punishes ethical behavior, would be better.
According to https://www.infographicsarchive.com/united-states-ranked-by-national-and-state-parks/ NJ has the 5th highest percentage of the state covered in national and state parks: 7.28%