kbin.social/sub should be only your subscribed zines.
As much as I plan on following suit, I think this kind of petty commenting can stay on reddit.
If youtube figures out that you’re a single male, nothing will stop then from throwing Andrew Tate and other right wing garbage in your feed. Literally as soon as I got into a relationship I immediately stopped getting them. Now I get weird relationship based stuff. But it was so bad, I blocking channels but new channels kept getting in there.
I get what google does, but I find the trade-off the be really convenient.
A funny creepy story I have is that I used to use a specific video to go to sleep, and apparently yt’s algorithm got so good at figuring out my sleep schedule that it would start recommending me that video when I started getting ready for bed.
I really don’t get duckduckgo. I use firefox and all for privacy and cause it’s better, but I’ve found duckduckgo to be quite inferior to google’s search. Is there some nuances I just don’t understand about duckduckgo?
Generally I lean personally towards that kind of stuff, but it does tend to over perform, I think an idea solution would be something like.
Tags for this sort of stuff, like erotic/one shot
By default they are filtered out, and are opt-in.
It’s important to make it opt in so that people who filter out ecchi don’t end up in a ghost town.
The math of trophic levels (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trophic_level) means that you’re never going to do better. The only really good options for improving the math is stuff like eating smaller animals (like bugs) or lab grown meat, and as the math shows, they’re still going to be worse than a heavily processed plant alternative.
I didn’t speak till I was 4, at which point my first sentence was “No, I want to walk” instead of being carried to the car.
Ghost in the Shell and Serial Experiments Lain are classics you can’t go wrong with.
So not entirely correct, the reason this is legal is because the amendment was only for letters (not numbers) and in fact the legal committee agreed that it allowed the creation of new numbers.
Source: http://lrbdigital.legis.wisconsin.gov/digital/collection/p16831coll2/id/663