TokenBoomer@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoMore than 1 million gallons of oil leaks into Gulf of Mexico, potentially putting endangered species at riskwww.cbsnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square69fedilinkarrow-up1361arrow-down116file-textcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1345arrow-down1external-linkMore than 1 million gallons of oil leaks into Gulf of Mexico, potentially putting endangered species at riskwww.cbsnews.comTokenBoomer@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square69fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squarePatches@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down2·edit-21 year agoRemoved by mod
minus-squaresartalon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down6·edit-21 year agoI don’t disagree with your sentiment. I think it is bad enough though, without the news source twisting it for sensationalism. *Edit. Hmm, I guess you people are ok with lies as long as they support the narrative you want. Is this suddenly a GoP sub?
minus-squarecorsicanguppylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoGotcha. Hey, how much oil has to be objectively confirmed to 7 significant figures before You’re concerned? How much is okay for you?
minus-squaresartalon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·1 year agoAny. Doesn’t mean I’m going to lie about the amount to get clicks. Let me ask you a similar question. How much of a lie does it need to be before you are willing to call it a lie?
minus-squareTwoGems@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down4·1 year agoSo you’re concerned with how much oil leaked? Does it matter? This shouldn’t be happening.
minus-squaresartalon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down3·1 year ago“I think it is bad enough though, without the news source twisting it for sensationalism.” Are you stupid?
Removed by mod
I don’t disagree with your sentiment.
I think it is bad enough though, without the news source twisting it for sensationalism.
*Edit. Hmm, I guess you people are ok with lies as long as they support the narrative you want. Is this suddenly a GoP sub?
Gotcha. Hey, how much oil has to be objectively confirmed to 7 significant figures before You’re concerned? How much is okay for you?
Any.
Doesn’t mean I’m going to lie about the amount to get clicks.
Let me ask you a similar question.
How much of a lie does it need to be before you are willing to call it a lie?
So you’re concerned with how much oil leaked? Does it matter? This shouldn’t be happening.
“I think it is bad enough though, without the news source twisting it for sensationalism.”
Are you stupid?
Yes