• Fermion@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This author cites his own tweets and offers no evidence. It is complete speculation. We need better writing than this to consider such an extraordinary claim seriously.

    • BertramDitore@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, not ideal, but he does link to Seymour Hersh’s investigation, which I read when it came out a while back, and found it to be comprehensive and pretty convincing. Unfortunately it looks like Hersh’s article is behind a paywall now, which really sucks.

      At the time (last February) I was genuinely surprised that it wasn’t being covered in the mainstream media with any substance, and then I started seeing the more recent reports this article mentions, that just uncritically parrot the US government’s official line. Something is very clearly out of place, and it seems like the major players are just hoping the world forgets and moves on, which it basically has.

      I thought blindly publishing the Bush administration’s lies about the Iraq war was supposed to have taught the mainstream media a lesson about accepting convenient messaging without doing a proper independent investigation.

      • spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Even Hersh’s article lacks any kind of supporting evidence, only siting a single unidentified source. His story is plausible, but plausible does not mean true.

      • masterspace
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Hersh’s story is ridiculed for a reason, it relies on a single unidentified source. I.e. he could have literally made it all up, or, that source could be an intelligence agent for who knows what country, or just some guy on an ego trip, or it could be legitimate, but there’s no evidence anywhere else that corroborates any part of his story. Good journalists usually corroborate a source’s story rather than publishing it on blind faith.

  • Ooops@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I managed reading 5 sentences to find the first obvious lie and stopped. But good to know that the gas prices did not at all skyrocket after February or after Russia stopped supplying gas under rediculous pretenses, but when the then unused pipelines were damaged… I guess I will demand my money back.

  • masterspace
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is a really dumb rant with no information in it.

    Just a guy ranting about how the US must have done it, and even now that it’s clear that it was a Ukrainian spec ops team, it obviously must still be the US training and directing them.

    Like honestly, this guy is dumb for being so confident given that he has the exact same information as the rest of us.