I was wondering what the point of lemmy was, if we can’t get a certain number of people, we won’t be able to thrive as a community and I don’t see lots of people joining even though it is an open-source and decentralised forum unlike reddit.

There are many obvious things lemmy could do better, should I make a report about it? I think we are lagging behind and not doing things which are obvious. A better GUI for mobile website would be one of the top suggestions I have. thoughs?

    • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 years ago

      Just a note that active monthly on lemmy, means you’ve posted or commented. Reddit might be using that more loosely, as in someone who just views the site. In that case their numbers might be highly inflated, include webcrawlers, etc.

      • triplenadir@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 years ago

        Oh good point, Reddit are almost definitely including people who just vote, and probably people who just view 🤦 Is it easy to get “unique ‘people’ who looked at it” numbers off Lemmy instances, to make a fairer comparison? (Not optimistic that Viacom will be releasing numbers of how many humans they think are actually using Reddit any time soon…)

        • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 years ago

          For logged in users, there is a table that checks if you’ve read a post, so it’d be possible yes. But IMO just viewing something shouldn’t count as “activity”.

          • triplenadir@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 years ago

            You’re saying you don’t want to add metrics just to have a dick-swinging contest with Reddit’s fake numbers? Confusing 😂

        • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          I think we have this as an open issue, but haven’t done anything with it yet. I wouldn’t mind reactions as long as they’re activitypub compatible.

          • liwott@nerdica.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 years ago

            @dessalines I think you misunderstood, I meant to ask whether comments and votes to lemmy post from other platforms are counted in Lemmy’s activities?

            • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 years ago

              Is it reactions, or votes? Afaik only lemmy votes are federated. What other platform has up and downvotes?

              • liwott@nerdica.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                3 years ago

                @dessalines Since you mention it, one issue I find with the federation of votes is that from Friendica I can see who the voters are, while I assume Lemmy users may expect their votes to be secret.

              • liwott@nerdica.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 years ago

                @dessalines Up and downvotes from Friendica seem to work very well 😀

                All I meant was that having a count of active Lemmy users that includes people who interact with Lemmy content may also be useful in probing the importance of the userbase. From example, right now I am directly only using Friendica, but it makes sense to consider that by replying to your comment, I am somehow using Lemmy.

                • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 years ago

                  The site activity counts use a local = true filter, but the community active counts don’t have that. Adding federated users to site activity counts would probably be wrong.