• 5BC2E7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    41
    ·
    1 year ago

    Are you suggesting that human shields have more value than the people who is being mortally attacked from behind the shields?

    • Orbituary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No. That’s exactly the point, you dipshit. They have AS MUCH value. Equal to.

    • RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Value is for spreadsheets.

      Humans have worth. And all humans have equal worth. All things actually.

      • 5BC2E7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        24
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t agree with that nice sounding platitude. Terrorists and pedophiles lives don’t have the same worth as a nobel price winner to society.

        • RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s a moral judgment. Worth has nothing to do with it.

          All things, by virtue of their existence, have equal worth.

        • AphoticDev@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Wonderful example, considering anybody can be nominated and win a Nobel peace prize, including people guilty of ethnic cleansing.

          • 5BC2E7@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            19
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            somehow I’m not surprised that you can’t even think about science and how it contributes to civilization. you are being intellectually dishonest by claiming that we are all equal and then you pick the worst possible example from the group instead of picking the best representatives of nobel prize winners before comparing them with terrorists.

            but sure I’ll take anyone from the list of nobel prize winners (which in my opinion are usually political) over someone that puts babies in ovens and burns them alive. it’s not really that complicated as you are trying to make it seem, even when you pick a strawman interpretation of my comment.

            EDIT: In a way I’m not surprised that the very people who defend hamas think that rapists and terrorists have the same worth as a nobel prize winner.

            • floofloof
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              No one is defending Hamas. People are defending all the innocent civilians who are being attacked and killed.

              • 5BC2E7@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                I hope that willfully ignoring the people defending hamas works for you.

        • ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          All things being equal, the IDF are bigger and more successful terrorists than Hamas and their response to the October 7 attack was a disproportionate response, despite the IDF also conducting operations in the west bank at the same exact time.

          Justice for Palestine

    • ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would suggest they are certainly more valuable than the incompetent marksmen who would rather make excuses than aim their fucking guns