• Devi@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Everyone was building empires at the time and fighting over who got what. All that nuking England would do is to mean France, the netherlands, germany, spain etc would get more bits

    • Square Singer@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Of course it wouldn’t stop colonialization, but it would change the future quite a lot.

      • No English-speaking superpowers/English as lingua franca
      • No Commonwealth
      • No wide-spread anglo common law based legal systems
      • Superpowers/alliances would be totally mixed up up to now.
      • China could have developed totally different due to them not constantly losing against the English.
      • No colonialization of the Welsh, Scots, Irish by the English

      I think that should shake up the timeline quite a bit.

      • Devi@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, you’d just have the exact same thing but with another nationality. France had like half of Africa so they’d definitely be bigger.

        • Square Singer@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          And wouldn’t that completely shift worldwide powerbalanes for centuries to come?

          For example, would WW2 have happened if France had been a global superpower instead of a pushover?

          Would the american revolution have happened with another colonial ruler?

          Without that example, would the french revolution have happened?

          Without both revolutions, would democracy be a thing by now, or would we still have totalitarian monarchies?

          You know the butterfly effect? It’s the same except we aren’t killing a butterfly but instead one of the superpower nations of that time.

          • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            France wasn’t a pushover around WW2. They had enough manpower to fight nazi Germany toe to toe. What they did, however, was underestimate how fast they could advance. France also ignored a warning that the germans were amassing to push through the Ardennes, which allowed the nazis to face little resistance on that front. Apparently, if they took immediate action, they could’ve mobilized an air raid to completely destroy that nazi battalion, which would royally fuck up the rest of Hitler’s plans

          • Devi@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            France was never a pushover. The idea that being invaded by a bigger stronger army was their fault is weird and one I’ve only heard in the US.

            Most countries that are colonies eventually seek independence, including most that France had.