Moving our Encrypted DNS servers to run in RAM | Mullvad VPN
mullvad.net
We recently announced the completion of our migration to remove all traces of disks in use on our VPN infrastructure.

“We recently announced the completion of our migration to remove all traces of disks in use on our VPN infrastructure.”

“Today we can announce more steps forward - our Encrypted DNS service has also been converted to run from RAM!”

            • MSugarhill@feddit.de
              1·
              1 year ago

              Works stable, nothing to complain on that side. I like that you can add more than five devices, even if you cannot use more than five simultaneously. But that covers my dual boot systems perfectly without hassling auround all the time. Still got twenty ports, now its five for new customers. But I use only four. And I like the highly customizable DNS with all its filter lists for ads, trackers, and more.

              What I dislike is that their app always wants root privileges, and for some reason I am not able to get the workaround running. So I use the fedora/Gnome Wireguard implementation now. And that for some odd reason the android app always closes unexpected, I think I tried everything, but nothing helps. But it works fine with the Wireguard for Android app. Never had those issues with Mullvad.

              I always loved sending cash or buying voucher cards for Mullvad, but on the other hand I got now three years for less than €65,–. Wait for a sale if you want to buy a longer subscription.

  • nucleative@lemmy.worldEnglish
    5·
    1 year ago

    Been with Mullvad a long time and it has been an excellent service.

    As they have grown, their IP pools are no longer as fresh and I get Google captcha’d on hardmode, or cloudflare blocked, or other account limitations when using the service that didn’t used to be there all the time now.

    I wish the VPN community had a way to solve for this.

      • nucleative@lemmy.worldEnglish
        3·
        1 year ago

        Yes, that may be the answer. But blocks of IPV6 can still be limited by entire subnets if security/cloud host/IT guys keep turning to this method of reducing their exposure to bad actors.

        It totally had its time and place, but it’s trivial to get “fresh IPs” from 4G VPN and proxy services that specialize at this (for a price), so as a security concept it’s only viable if your attacker’s budget is under $20.