TechDirt’s Mike Masnick gets it exactly right in covering Canada’s C-18 bill:

If you believe in the open web, if you believe that you should never have to pay to link to something, if you believe that no one should have to pay to provide you a benefit, then you should support Meta’s stance here. Yes, it’s self-serving for Meta. Of course it is. But, even if it’s by accident, or a side-effect, it’s helping to defend the open web, against a ridiculous attack from an astoundingly ignorant and foolish set of Canadian politicians.

And just generally points out the huge holes in Heritage Minister Pablo Rodriguez understanding from the Power & Politics Interview.

  • Boris Mann@news.cosocial.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sure. Then it should also apply to independent media. Which the Canadian bill does not. The Canadian government is picking and chooseing who news media is.

    • Thief
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would be happy for the law to be modified and improved. The first draft isnt always the best. Just a step forward thats all.

      • PowerSeries
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is past the third reading though, it’s far from a first draft .

    • TemporaryBoyfriend
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The law of unintended consequences applies. If they take out links to established media, then what will fill the gap? In the case of some of my family, thinly veiled far-right ‘blogs’ substitute as news at the best of times. If media orgs that have some basis in reality are removed… What’s left?