This is an EFF project that allows you to understand how easy it is to identify and track your browser based on how it appears to websites. Anonymous data will be collected through this site.
This is an EFF project that allows you to understand how easy it is to identify and track your browser based on how it appears to websites. Anonymous data will be collected through this site.
Using Firefox on iPhoneedit: Nvm previous result, I got the same result OP did with Firefox and Safari, I realized I was testing on my wifi with a pihole… switched to mobile network only and protection dropped to partial.
edit2: but Firefox Focus still has strong protection:
Yeah I got the same result.
I wonder in the fingerprint is a spoof and the result is a false positive? Because Mozilla says there is fingerprint protection in Firefox.
Your hunch is correct, it is a false positive. Firefox uses a bunch of fingerprints across thousands of users, which poisons the tracking data, rendering it useless.
Ah? Good! I was trying to find more info on how it works behind the scenes but couldn’t find anything. Do you happen to have a source?
I seem to get that same result on iPhone for Firefox, Safari and Braveedit: see original reply
Firefox Focus still has “strong” result.
I get “Partial Protection” on Chrome and two generic named browsers, and a flat-out “No” for Opera Mini
Before anyone asks “why” about anything listed here, I have to test webpages for compatibility across browsers. Having them installed is the only way to do that.
My results were skewed because I was testing through a pihole, switched to mobile and got OP’s result.