Ok, this is not going to be a well formulated question, because the concerns behind it are nebulous in my own head.

Some assumptions I have, that clearly inform the question that follows: I believe commercial, state, and others have sophisticated methods of influencing what I see on social media and thus, in part, what I think. I also believe that someone more willing to believe in the types of conspiratorial beliefs I’ve just expressed are more likely to be manipulated by information they’re exposed to. And, yes, I fully appreciate the irony of those beliefs.

My child is adult enough that belief patterns I encourage are very unlikely to become deep patterns. That is, I’d have to work to indoctinate my son, and he’d actively resist if my indoctrination was outside of societal norms.

He didn’t grow up exposed to the social media I suspect children do now.

How does a parent inoculate a child to the influence of social media without also creating a mindset willing to believe in a nebulous “them” that controls things—a mindset, I believe, that makes a person more likely to be controlled?

  • fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Well, there’s not just one Them.

    The Them who wrote your American history textbook and glossed over the centrality of slavery to the Confederate cause, aren’t the same Them who write TV sitcoms that propagate stereotypes of bumbling clueless men entitled to dump all the emotional labor on their hyper-competent women partners.

    The Them who fund intrusive social media, aren’t the same Them who dial down the yellow-light time on your traffic lights to catch more people with red-light cameras.

    And the closer you look, the less it looks like a Them at all.

    The individual TV writers were really trying to be good TV writers, in the social & economic context of TV studios.

    The history textbook people were mostly actual professors. They want you to have a good history textbook. But the Texas Board of Education is giving them a hard time.

    Heck, the social-media programmers mostly just wanna launch cool stuff.

    The yellow-light people, though? They have no goddamn excuse.

    • PerogiBoi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s so hard to see from your perspective sometimes. Feels like everything’s a conspiracy haha. But you are 100% correct.

      The “them” we feel is the sum of all human outcomes, personified as a discrete organism. Maybe all of humanity is one big mega-organism and thats the “them”.

      • RedMarsRepublic@vlemmy.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        But 99% of humanity has no influence on popular culture and the 1% who do are highly skewed towards rich, western, etc.

    • Cyborganism@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, but in the end all those people get their orders from higher up, and in the end they execute the vision of the people in charge. All of this only to get their pay to be able to afford to live with a roof over their head and food on the table.

      • CthulhuDreamer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I feel the “order” is more in line with “make me a sitcome that targets young man and will make me a lot of money” rather than “propagate misogyny and stereotypes”. Both lead to Big Bang Theory though.