I am an anarchist, so the idea of the community doing all the work, creating content, and then mods basically ruling over them as a reward, just doesn’t sit right with me.

We the users should collectively be in control of all our social media, economically and with regards of controling what goes on, on there.

All social media get’s its value from the users i.e. the network effect. However the users are subjected to a hierachical place where individuals in power act as tyrants.

We create the value we should be in charge.

Fellow Lemmings how can we create social media were the users are king/queen?

post Scriptum: just having a voting mechanism, might be gamed by unsavory charcters or groups to game such a system, unless voting requires your clear name id, which comes with other issues of course.

  • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I feel this problem requires cryptography of some sort and the ability to establish identity for users without de-anonymizing them. idk if that makes sense to you

    Sorry, but that is laughable.

    You want people to be both responsible and anonymous at the same time.

    You are dreaming.

    • BigBlackCockroach@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      I upvoted you, But sometimes dreams come true, if you make them.

      I do not believe this to be laughable at all. We are faced with a problem: Online discourse is the rule, the public square is a thing of the past (as private entities encroach on it) -> if all online places are ruled with an iron fist by sometimes benevolent sometimes maliscious tyrants, we can kiss free speech good bye.

      This problem demands a solution. There is nothing laughable about this. ridicule me all you want but I know I am on to something.