Organisers hope the women’s strike – whose confirmed participants include fishing industry workers, teachers, nurses and the PM, Katrín Jakobsdóttir – will bring society to a standstill to draw attention to the country’s ongoing gender pay gap and widespread gender-based and sexual violence.

  • 0x815@feddit.deOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s huge in general but varies from country to country

    Just a note: I don’t know what others say and what the mods prefer here, but I guess they’d agree there is no such thing as a “third world country”. Let’s call the continent or so and let us there be in one world :-)

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      As someone from a third world country living in a first world country, yeah the difference is still there and depending on where you are in the third world, it’s not decreasing.

      • Turun@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think it’s mostly the term that is being criticised. It originated from the capitalist/communist/irrelevant categorization of countries during the cold war. As such it does not actually describe much. No one would call Russia a second world country. The definition and colloquial use has diverged.

        The term developing country is in my opinion much more descriptive.

    • yeather
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nah man there’s still third world countries for sure. Even second world is still relevant for now.

      • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Third world country used to mean a country that wasn’t on the side of either the US or the USSR during the Cold War. Not sure what it means now.

        • apis@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          In regular parlance it very quickly came to mean countries that are very underdeveloped, with high levels of poverty, simply because this tended to map quite closely to non-alignment.

          Unless you’re reading something about cold war geopolitics, most use of the term takes this casual meaning, though you can usually get confirmation of what is meant from context.

          I don’t see it used as much as in the past.

        • yeather
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          First world countries are developed on an industrial level and a cultural level for personal liberties and democracy. The US, most of Europe, Japan, etc. are all first world countries. Second world are developed industrialy but not so democratically. China and Russia are good examples. Third world countries are those underdeveloped industrially and democratically. Most of Africa and countries in turmoil like Venezuela are good examples of third world countries.

          • Turun@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            This is how it is used colloquially (though I have never heard the term second world country), but goes contra to the actual definition of the word.

            I much prefer the term developing country, because it conveys what you actually want to describe in the first place.