• jsdz@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The “info” thing was a misguided attempt by a crazed bunch of emacs zealots to usurp the rightful position of “man”. Probably GNU’s worst idea. It persisted in having some popularity for a decade or more but is now mostly forgotten I think. Despite having used Debian for the past ten years straight I’ve only just now found out that info doesn’t even get installed by default any more.

    • iusearchbtw@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      Eh, to be honest, manpages aren’t particularly good as either documentation or quick references (hence the popularity of tldr), and info is intended primarily for the sort of long-form, comprehensive documentation that would be awkward to fit in a manpage. Also, texinfo documents can easily be exported to HTML, so one format can be used for both online and offline docs. It’s an admirable effort, if nothing else.

      • kugiyasan@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I wasn’t a huge fan of manpages either until I got a kernel class at uni. The man pages for syscalls and library calls are super well made.

      • jsdz@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’d have liked it a lot better if it had been intended and used as a place to put the more extensive documentation that isn’t really appropriate for a man page, while leaving the man pages as they were. Instead, I learned about it back in the day by being frequently annoyed at missing man pages for basic tools, which had been replaced with suggestions to look at ‘info’ instead, which always seemed to be much less concise and have a worse UI.

    • TurboTurbo@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Can you provide any source that it was created or initiated by what you call ‘a crazed bunch of emacs zealots’, or that the goal was to ‘unsurp the rightful position of “man”’. Quite bold statements that are unlikely to be true imho.

    • Infiltrated_ad8271@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just because it’s theirs? I figured it would be because of an alleged gender issue, for the same reason some are trying to do away with whitelists/blacklists and the like.

      • jsdz@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, nothing to do with that sort of thing. The idea was that it’d be all hypertexty and therefore better.