The Future of Sovereign AI

We still don’t know just how important and disruptive artificial intelligence will be, but one thing seems clear: the power of AI should not remained cordoned off by centralized companies. Our panelists—Cody Wilson of Defense Distributed, Native Planet’s ~mopfel-winrux, Tlon’s Lukas Buhler, along with @mogmachine from Bittensor and David Capone from Harmless AI—are the perfect team to explore the possibilities unlocked by more sovereign, decentralized, and open AI.

[A bitcoiner, an ancap, a 3-D gun printer, an alt-righter, the founder of Hatreon and a convicted kiddle fucker walk into a bar. The barman picks up a baseball bat and says “get the fuck out of my bar, Cody.”]

Cancelling the Culture Industry

In a world of moral totalitarianism, sometimes freedom looks like a short story about sex tourism in the Philippines. In this panel, author Sam Frank hosts MRB editor in chief Noah Kumin, romance writer Delicious Tacos, sex detective Magdalene Taylor and frog champion Lomez of Passage Press. Join them for a freewheeling discussion of saying whatever they want while evading the digital hall monitors.#

[not being able to live within five hundred feet of a school is a small price to pay for true freedom]

Securing Urbit

How do we make Urbit secure? And what does a secure Urbit look like? The great promise of Urbit has always been that it can provide a sovereign computing platform for the individual—a means by which to do everything you would want to do on a computer without giving up your data. For that dream to be fulfilled, Urbit should be as secure as your crypto hardware wallet—perhaps moreso. Moderated by Rikard Hjort, Urbit experts Logan Allen, and Joe Bryan discuss with Urbit fan and cybersecurity expert Ryan Lackey.

[as secure as a crypto hardware wallet, you say]

Rebooting the Arts

The culture war is over—Culture lost. Now it’s a race to build a new one. Media whisperer Ryan Lambert leads a conversation with Play Nice founder/impresario Hadrian Belove. trend forecaster Sean Monahan, and controversial art-doc collective Kirac. They discuss how to win the culture race, and create a new arts ecosystem out of the rubble.

[the answer is to get Peter Thiel to try to magic up Dimes Square out of nothing, isn’t it?]

How to Fund a New World

Cosimo de Medici persuaded Benvenuto Cellini, the Florentine sculptor, to enter his service by writing him a letter which concluded, ‘Come, I will choke you with gold.’ Join UF Director of Markets Andrew Kim as he discusses how to get more gold onto Urbit with Jake Brukhman of Coinfund, Jae Yang of Tacen, @BacktheBunny from RabbitX and Evan Fisher of Portal VC.

[the answer’s still Thiel, isn’t it?]

  • sinedpick@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Random musings but I feel like posting: I almost got sucked into the urbit hole. I thought it was such a cool idea and implementation, and all the fun names and technical purity was so attractive to me at age 18 (this was before the crypto circus and urbit barely did anything except talk to a terminal).

    It took me a while to realize that there is, actually, zero reason to give nonsensical names to literally every aspect of software, and also pretty dumb to try to shoehorn everything through a tiny functional core (“Nock”) while slowly re-learning all the lessons of 50 years of compiler development. So why use it at all?

    Using urbit over a normal Linux stack comes purely with downsides. Slow, buggy, obscurantist, and so on. This means whoever actually dedicates their precious time to developing this unconditionally buys into the ideology. I never thought an ideology could be so powerful that it could corrupt the minds of my people (software monkeys).

    Urbit is a truly fascistHHnating phenomenon.

    • froztbyte@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      it feels like the obscurantism is a stolen magician’s trick? keep people too misdirected with all the weird shit and they might not notice the other parts that a lot of people might find themselves objecting to (if it were clearly laid out at first)

    • David Gerard@awful.systemsOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      our esteemed system owner @self recommends you stop worrying and learn to love NixOS, which Yarvin plagiarised wholesale

      • sinedpick@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m a nixos fanatic, thank you very much! I even installed nixos on my (non-technical) SO’s computer. Was this a mistake? Yes. Do I care? no.

        • self@awful.systemsM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I need to release grandma-mode, a set of defaults for a remote deploy only NixOS desktop with an app store that installs user-local packages

      • froztbyte@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        speaking of

        froztbyte@bambam ~ % nix-shell -p nix-info --run "nix-info -m"
         - system: `"aarch64-darwin"`
         - host os: `Darwin 22.6.0, macOS 13.5`
         - multi-user?: `yes`
         - sandbox: `no`
         - version: `nix-env (Nix) 2.18.1`
         - channels(root): `"nixpkgs"`
         - nixpkgs: `/nix/var/nix/profiles/per-user/root/channels/nixpkgs`
        

        and even after knowing about it for the better part of 6~7 years, it’s @self’s fault that I’m finally giving it a try