usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoSeriously, why are we heavily subsidizing this?i.imgur.comimagemessage-square13fedilinkarrow-up121arrow-down12
arrow-up119arrow-down1imageSeriously, why are we heavily subsidizing this?i.imgur.comusernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square13fedilink
minus-squareNi@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoThere are often talks of carbon taxing, but removing subsidies would seen to be the obvious first step. Subdiside greener options instead.
minus-squareusernamesAreTricky@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoRemoving and reducing subsidies also generally has better polling as well from what I’ve seen
minus-squareNi@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-21 year agoDo you think so? From the people I know I think cutting meat and fossil fuel subsidises would be very unpopular. We have climbing food prices so if meat became more expensive I think there might be uproar - it’s needed though!
There are often talks of carbon taxing, but removing subsidies would seen to be the obvious first step. Subdiside greener options instead.
Removing and reducing subsidies also generally has better polling as well from what I’ve seen
Do you think so? From the people I know I think cutting meat and fossil fuel subsidises would be very unpopular. We have climbing food prices so if meat became more expensive I think there might be uproar - it’s needed though!