• deegeese@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    38
    ·
    9 months ago

    I used to tie my ugly mutt up in front of the corner market while I grab a few things. Never to someone’s bike of course.

    I do not take such a risk with my expensive purebred.

      • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        23
        ·
        9 months ago

        I didn’t own both dogs at the same time, but 100% serious. What’s the problem?

        • MaggiWuerze@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          You don’t see an issue in handling a dog poorly, because, as you put it, it’s an “ugly mutt” and then go ahead and tell us how much better you treat an animal because it was more expensive?

          You really shouldn’t be allowed to own a dog or any animal.

      • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        9 months ago

        Why? Because I know which dog might get stolen?

        Should I have denied the mutt walks because of what people might think? Or should I endanger the purebred out of some strange sense of fairness?

        • can@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Without the additional context it easily sounds like you don’t give a shit what happens to some mutt.

    • Calavera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I see this all the time, don’t think it’s such a big deal also, sometimes I don’t understand social network people