The Nvidia NV1 was released in 1995, it was the first GPU with 3D capabilities for PC… form there we know how things went by.

Now it’s 2023, so let’s make some “retro futuristic” prediction… what would you think about a AI board, open source driver, open API as Vulkan which you can buy to power the AI for your videogames? It would make sense to you? Which price range it should be?

What’s supposed to do for your games… well, that’s depend on videogames. The quickiest example I can think of is having endless discussion with your NPC in your average, single player, Fantasy RPG.

For example, the videogame load your 4~5 companions with the psychology/behaviors: they are fixated with the main quest goal (like you talk with fanatic people, this to make sure the game the main quest is as much stable as possible) but you can “break them” by making attempt to reveal some truths (for example, breaking the fourth wall), and if you go for this path, the game warns that you’re probably going to lock out the main quest (like in Morrowind when you kill essential NPC)

  • thepianistfroggollum@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Buddy, I have actual training in AI/ML from some of the leading engineers in the field, and my job leverages AI/ML very successfully to do a task really similar to what OP is looking for.

    Maybe the versions available to the public to play with aren’t up to the task, but using AWS Bedrock you can absolutely get results like OP wants.

    • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      You and the other 5 million companies hemorrhaging money on extremely heavy operations that are universally fucking terrible.

      If you’re willing to claim LLMs are even 1% of the way to what he asked for, you either have absolutely no clue what the tech is or you’re a scammer trying to steal money from people.

      The cutting edge of LLMs have nothing in common with intelligence.

        • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I can read perfectly fine.

          You claiming to be an expert when your assertion proves that it’s literally impossible for you to be is simply not persuasive. You’re doing the equivalent of claiming to be a geologist while arguing for a flat earth. It’s inherently proof that you’re full of shit.