• guyman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Dang, that’s lame. I guess it’s up to users to adapt LO to their distro.

          • jerry@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Im a redhat user, and also dislike flatpaks, snaps, and allat. The only sane “uber package” is appimage and I’m tired of pretending it’s not.

          • PlexSheep@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I mean, flatpaks are cool and all, but native packaging of distro repos is the non plus ultra for me.

        • dlarge6510@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Many like myself don’t like the old idea of downloading stuff that “just runs”. It’s too much going back to the old ways with windows where you randomly just downloaded a binary off a website and ran it.

          Basically it’s the equivalent of sideloading apps on mobile devices. I won’t do that either unless it is required.

          Now I do have one such app, in appimage which is my preference anyway. KDEnlive, which I run as an appimage Vs the Debian package only because I’m on Debian 10 on my main machine and have yet to pencil in the upgrade time.

          Now, GNU Guix is interesting. Cryptographically secure and verified compilation (or pre-compilation) of source code straight from GitHub etc. Now, that will be more like it!

          • LaggyKar@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You wouldn’t go to a website and download something (unlike AppImage), you would install it through Flatpak.