The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps gave the final go-ahead last Monday in Beirut

Iranian security officials helped plan Hamas’s Saturday surprise attack on Israel and gave the green light for the assault at a meeting in Beirut last Monday, according to senior members of Hamas and Hezbollah, another Iran-backed militant group.

Officers of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps had worked with Hamas since August to devise the air, land and sea incursions—the most significant breach of Israel’s borders since the 1973 Yom Kippur War—those people said.

Details of the operation were refined during several meetings in Beirut attended by IRGC officers and representatives of four Iran-backed militant groups, including Hamas, which holds power in Gaza, and Hezbollah, a Shiite militant group and political faction in Lebanon, they said.

      • TechyDad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        As a GenX-er, I grew up with WW3 as a constant possibility. My third grade teacher showed us a TV movie about nuclear war that had me thinking every plane that flew overhead was a nuclear missile.

        Maybe this is why GenX is the “whatever” generation. When you grow up thinking you’re going to die at any moment, you tend to shrug off a lot of stuff.

      • ohlaph@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Tell me about it. Wars, financial collapses, housing crisis, mass inflation…

        It hasn’t been great.

        • Agent641@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          They send those things everywhere. This isnt going to escalate much further, its just another regional skirmish that will die down in 1-2 news cycles

      • kent_eh
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        When both sides of a conflict make the claim that the same piece of dirt is sacred to their religion, it’s unlikely for cooler heads to get a word in edgeways.

        • Gargleblaster@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          26
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well, there’s also the fact that after WWII, while the Allies were dividing the world up like a giant birthday cake, they created most of these problems: North Korea, Iraq-Kuwait, and plunking a new Jewish country down in the middle of Arabia.

          If the Allies had decided that Ohio is a new Jewish country, what would’ve been the fallout from that?

          As much as we seem a step removed from this issue, we made the problem.

          • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            New Jewish country? It was a Jewish nation first and Jews have lived there FAR longer than Arabs.

            This is more like if the US lost WWII and the axis decided to give the Native Americans back their territories.

            • Grayox@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Even according to the Bible/Torah it wasn’t a Jewish Nation first, it was a “Promised Land” which they conquered.

              • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Also, the concept of a “nation” didn’t exist until the late 1700s. There were Jewish tribes in the Levant region, along with a ton of other tribes, many of which were just loose clans of family groups.

              • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                It gets really into the weeds.

                As an ethnic group, Arabs trace back to Abraham through his first son Ishmael from his concubine Hagar.

                Jews trace back to Abraham through his son Isaac and grandson Jacob, who was renamed Israel.

                • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Ethnic groups don’t trace back to single people, especially not ones from fairy tales.

                  • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    According to the Abrahamic tradition, Arabs are descendants of Abraham through his son Ishmael.[73] Islamic sources state that Abraham brought Hagar and Ishmael to Mecca.[74] The 14th century Arab historian Ibn Kathir mention that the pre-Islamic Arabs considered Ishmael as their patriarch.

                    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arabs

                    Tracing their lineage to Abraham and Ishmael is literally the common element that ties them together as an ethnic group.

          • wolf6152@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            May the coming nuclear war wipe all forms of religion from the face of the earth. 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻

              • Sibelius Ginsterberg@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                As much as I agree, that religion makes people do stupid/dangerous/horrible things, both of the world wars were not started for religious reasons. So maybe, there are more things that make people hate each other than just religion.

                • kent_eh
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Religion is seldom the initial cause of wars, but it is almost always used as a tool to motivate and drag the population along with the war effort.