Canonical is enacting manual reviews for all newly registered uploads to its Snap Store following what it describes as a ‘potential security incident’.

In this instance it appears that folks have uploaded apps purporting to be official apps/tools for crypto ledger tool Ledger and these apps were able to get folks backups codes (which people enter thinking it’s legit) and …the bad actors can use that to extract funds.

Based on what Canonical has said so far – and the actions they’ve taken – it doesn’t seem like these malicious snaps were exploiting security holes within snaps, snapd, or the Snap Store infrastructure itself – which is a good thing.

Snapcraft Forum Announcement

  • Infiltrated_ad8271@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Flatpak has extra complexity but its approach is to distrust apps, hence it is more secure than a traditional package. The problem here is that snap’s approach is to trust canonical.

    • Vilian
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      and EVERY ONE of flatpak packages are verified before being added to the store, doubt that canonical do that

      • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Canonical does check each package. Now they even check each upload manually. Flathub doesn’t check much once an app is on the store.