recent: tears of the kingdom, or as i like to call it botw 1.2, its the same thing all over again just with one or two added gimicks, the open world is dead, npcs are boring and nintendo just got away with it like that

not so recent: i cant stand persona 5, joker and his entourage are annoying teenagers, the time management is a horrible gameplay addition and the artstyle is just a visual overstimulation

with that being said,~~ plz dont kill me~~

  • polygon@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ll probably get roasted for this but… Pokemon. It just seems like endless copy/paste and might be one of the laziest game franchises I’ve ever seen. I’ve really tried to get into them. I was there when the Pokemon cartoon started, I saw it rise to the phenomenon it is today, but damn if it isn’t the most boring grindfest ever.

    • Mandy@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      it doesnt just feel like copy paste, thats quite literally what they are doing, there is plenty of evidence online to show that they do but hey, if you can make whatever low effort thing you want and people still buy it why bother trying?

      • Julian@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s no problem with copy/paste, games do that all the time (look at portal, most of that game is reused half life 2 assets). I think the problem is that they’re just not doing anything interesting with the games. If the games were good it shouldn’t matter if the Pikachu model is reused or made from scratch.

        • Mandy@beehaw.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sure but they also straight up lied about making fancy new assets for switch while they just literally copied and pasted from 3ds That lie, I find not okay

    • runawaycorvid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I do agree that it’s the same thing recycled over and over.

      If anyone does want to play them again, I highly recommend emulating them and accelerating the emulation to 2.5 or 3x speed. Makes it much more tolerable.

    • Jentu@lemmy.film
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The pokemon fan games have been way more inventive than the mainline games for a while now. I just recently have been getting into pokemon infinite fusion and it’s FANTASTIC

      • uglymirror@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I so badly want to play infinite fusion but I cant seem to get it to work, it crashes everywhere I’ve tried to play :(

    • LukasT@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They get away with the copy-paste because the combat system is fundamentally extremely solid.

      The good thing about this is that programming-savvy fans have been creating free fan-games based on the formula for the last decade or so. As with any fan-made content the quality is extremely variable, but I have found some of the newer releases to be genuinely good games, better than anything GameFreak has put out in the last 20 years. Pokémon Unbound is a personal favorite - if you enjoy the fundamentals of the Pokémon games but feel the lack of creativity and puzzle-solving in the official releases I would suggest giving them a look.

  • ohokthatsgood@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    I still can’t make it through any of The Witcher games. Smooth and satisfying gameplay is super important for me to enjoy a game, and The Witcher has always felt slow, clunky, unintuitive, and super menu-heavy. I’m sure the story is great! But I just can’t get past its gameplay.

    • doostein@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I adore Witcher 3. That said I’ve always said controlling Geralt feels like driving a boat. God help you for the very few instances that you do platforming.

      • eutsgueden@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        They added a different control style sometimes after release, didn’t they? I can’t recall the specific difference, but I think I used it for my playthroughs and it was less boat-y.

        • doostein@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not sure there. I played it several years after release, but I can’t remember one way or the other if there were alternate control options.

    • KHTangent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same here. I really want to like The Witcher 3, but after trying to play it for 10 hours without feeling any enjoyment, I just gave up.

    • Cambionn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m playing mainly western RPG’s like that, but I also couldn’t get into The Witcher. The gameplay is fine actually (I played way more clunky games with lots of enjoyment). But somehow Gerald just never clicked with me, causing me never to feel really connected to my character and to what’s happening.

      It’s sad because I can notice how good the games are, but I just really cannot get into it.

    • BoneALisa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It took me 3 attempts at starting The Witcher before I eventually got through it. I had just came off of Dark Souls 3 combat, so the combat in Witcher was especially clunky feeling. Eventually I moved into a new home, had nothing else to do, and proceeded to do nothing but play the game for 50 hours until I beat the game lol. I would say the story is worth it, but I agree that its kinda tough to get into.

    • 💡dim@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I tried to play Witcher 3 and the combination of strange camera angles and very “tradional rpg” style icons put me off (the later is a really sad thing to be bugged by but whatever) - the interface for everything just seemed very outdated

      However, I now have a PS5 and i believe the PS5 update has huge improvements including to camera angles etc, so I may give it another go.

    • Scrumpf_Dabogy@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I couldn’t get into Witcher 3 for a very silly reason. I’m a delicate white man who couldnt stand being the target of racism in a game. I played for like, 3 hours and just felt sad.

  • darius_drake@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    This will be an extremely hot take for some: Almost all recent online games are complete garbage that solely exist to make profit and create addicted user bases and they hurt what videogames truly are, a revolutionary and interactive form of art.

  • CptNoobCanoe@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Red Dead Redemption 2. Everyone goes on about how awesome it is, but I just found the story and gameplay really slow and dull.

    • sjolsen@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      RDR2 suffers heavily from the same problem as GTAV’s single player mode: it’s a movie posing as a video game and both aspects suffer for it.

      RDR2 would have been great if it was just the part where you wander around tracking critters and collecting flowers and playing cowboy dress-up, but the game really doesn’t want you to do that. Not to belabor the point, but between how unpredictable the connection between “interact with item/character X” and “start mission with character Y” can be and the game’s tendency to fail missions the second you go off-script, RDR2 often felt like it was directed by someone who actively resented the concept of player agency.

      • Kindajustlikewhat@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        You articulated my issue with it perfectly. In theory it was this amazing open world with tons of player freedom, but the minute you engage with the actual story at all you have no choice in anything. There was one quest where I HAD to rescue Micah and kill a butt load of people which really annoyed me given I was going for a white hat run.

      • foonex@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        There‘s this great video essay that basically agrees with you. Rockstar want to create these cinematic narrative experiences but that does not mash well with their concept of an open world.

    • thirdtower@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      My friends love it, but two hours in, I just feel worn.

      Then I just drop it and never look back.

      Can’t get it to stick.

    • Seraph089@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Rockstar has been moving that way in general for years. They get so focused on the immersive and sim stuff, they forget that they made their name on over-the-top chaotic fun. Everything from GTA4 onward suffers for it, other than RDR1 that struck a decent balance between the approaches.

      • Pigeon@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I was really enjoying it, but I eventually got bogged down in the sidequests, and it really could’ve used a low-gore mode. The bloody deer carcasses got to me after a while.

        I think I might have preferred it if it were a little smaller and more focused on the main storylines.

        I do intend to go back to it sooner or later though.

    • Asimo@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same here. It was so frustrating trying to play it.

      Here’s a pretty awesome looking intricate and interesting world. No, you can go over there. Or there. Or do that

    • foonex@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I‘m with you. I don‘t get why so many people praise the story and the gameplay.

      The mission design is very disappointing. You have this beautiful open world with so many systems that you can interact with. It can be fun to just start some shit and watch the chaos unfold. But the second you start a mission, everything is scripted and like on rails. You have no real freedom whatsoever in how you want approach a mission. The missions are also not challenging in the least (apart from some jank here and there). It‘s mostly just one turkey shoot after another.

      Story spoilers

      The story is not all that great. It‘s just not believable that anyone sane would stick so long with a gang leader who does not make a single good decision and clearly goes more and more off the deep end. It is also too long and overstays its welcome by tens of hours. Especially the whole Guarma chapter is hot garbage and would not have been missed at all if it weren‘t there.

      I made it through to the end. I had to see for myself where they are going with the story. But I was kind of glad when it was over.

      I wish another studio could license the world that Rockstar have created and make a game that is actually good. But that is never going to happen.

    • Poitou@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      My main grip with this game is how slow ans cranky everything feels. I miss the arcade feel of RDR1.

  • lunasloth@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly, Stardew Valley for me. I’ve tried it a couple times and it just didn’t work for me. I wanted to like it, and I like the idea of it, but in practice, I hated the time management aspect and not being able to just run around and do as much as I wanted in a day (I haven’t played on PC with mods; I know there’s at least one or two that let you change that). I also hated the fishing. 🙃

  • Jentu@lemmy.film
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Any game that has daily login bonuses or a bonus for playing every day. Animal crossing pocket or whatever it is. Pokémon go. A bunch of afk phone games. A bunch of gacha games. It just feels so shallow to me. Like, I’m not being manipulated to play something, I just end up feeling so guilty to lose a streak I’d rather delete the game.

    • Dathknight@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      While not a daily login bonus, the weekly and monthly tasklist of Forza Horizon 5 killed the game for me. It triggered some sort of fomo and I would rush in every week to grind the new tasks/events. That burned me out very fast, so I could not enjoy the rest of the game.

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think this CAN work if you naturally enjoy the game, but don’t want to make decisions about your game plan when you boot up.

      I like Deep Rock Galactic. When given 15 mission options, I get choice paralysis, so it’s nice to have dailies/assignments that at least push me into a particular one just to get started.

  • naxsat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Didn’t play Skyrim at the time and the two times I’ve tried to get into It didn’t really click for me. I understand why people like It, may give another try sometime

    • TeaHands@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh thank god, I came here to say Skyrim and was afraid of being the only one.

      I should have liked it. Absolutely loved Morrowind. But just never could get into Skyrim despite multiple attempts and now I’ve given up.

      • TheMonkeyLord@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        In all fairness, you wouldn’t like it just because you liked Morrowind. The games play entirely different from one another and the story of Skyrim is a downgrade by several margins (though some of the sidequests are awesome).

        This is coming from someone who has like 200 hours in Skyrim.

    • Pigeon@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I could never get over the fucking monotone same-voice way every NPC speaks.

      Everything about that game felt monotone, to me.

      I think about trying again, once in a while, but haven’t yet. They keep releasing new versions at prices I’m not willing to pay for it.

      • psudo@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I tried that, but in the end it turns out I found hunting for mods more fun than actually playing them.

    • Julian@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I never managed to get far in Skyrim. And even if you like it, I don’t think it’s too controversial to say that it has one of the worst intros for an open world game.

  • Gert@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Didn’t see anyone else mention it, so I’ll say MMOs. Pretty much all of them. WoW, FFXIV, Guild Wars 2, Star Wars one (can’t remember the name). I really like the idea of MMOs, having a huge shared world that feels alive, tons of lore, epic quests, but I just find the gameplay loop so boring. They just feel like endless busywork to me.

  • thunderbird32@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Borderlands: I mean the combat is fine and all, but the story is super weak. What is my incentive to keep playing? Just to click on more heads? There are better games for that (Doom, Quake, etc)

      • Inspectigator@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I played the crap out of borderlands… until one day I asked myself why… and… I never picked it up again. After that switch was flipped, the whole series just fell apart on me.

      • dwindling7373@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I stuggled with it so many times. I think Borderlands games, in general, are the ones I tried the most to enjoy, because everything about it is cool to me, the eastetic, the characters, the presentation…

        I restarted the first at least 4 times, alone and in coop, thinking the problem was that it doesn’t work as a solo experience. I played the sniper and then I tried the gunman because, maybe, the sniper is not that enjoyable.

        Then I got the 2, because maybe the first was too raw and basic.

        I just… don’t have fun.

        I point the cursor toward waves of spongy healthbars, and then I get server a giant plate of paralyzing choices between 64 billion gear options that clutter me and my frail mind.

        I ended up loving Tales from the Borderlands: all the good from the worldbuilding and none of the gameplay loop.

    • MachineTeaching@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah basically. It’s a loot shooter, it’s very fun in co-op but not good enough to carry itself in singleplayer.

      • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I was watching an escapist video about modern life service games and he said “saying a game is more fun with friends is a virtue of your friends, not the game.”

        If a game needs friends to be fun, I think it’s just a garbage game.

        • MachineTeaching@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t think that always holds water, some games are just made to be played with others. Nobody is going to accuse Counter-Strike of being bad just because playing against bots isn’t the most thrilling experience. But for games like Borderlands definitely. Point being, the logic goes it’s bad and only saved by playing with friends doesn’t stop it from being a bad game, not that a game is bad just because it’s more fun with friends.

          • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I guess I’m more specifically referring to the modern looter shooter live service bullshit that’s been taking over the industry. Not standard PvP multiplayer. Of course that’s the intended experience there, can’t blame that.

  • gingerrich@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The Witcher 3.

    It just feels so generic and suffers from one of the things I hate the most about rpgs. Endless sidequests that have nothing to do with the main quest.

    Cyberpunk 2077. The first part was really enjoyable. Then you get to the open world part and it suffers from the same issue as the Witcher above and also has fiddly levelling up/skill tree. Also it’s overwhelming. You’re on a mission. The phone calls. Sone rando wants you for a job. Start job. The phone calls. There’s an out of control ai taxi…repeat. Just too much information at once and mostly for stuff unrelated to the fact your character has a very personal and important mission.

    Survival/Builder games I find incredibly boring.

    • Mandy@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Witcher 3 felt more like “I have sex and you should know about it” the game, to me at least

  • SirSauceLordtheThird@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have over 1300 hours in fallout 4, and 3 & vegas combined are probably in a similar realm. So I really want to like Skyrim, but I just don’t care for it nearly as much. It gets so much praise but when I look at it it all looks so samey. The dungeons all feel identical, the combat is extremely boring, and you have the same combat music playing over and over.

    Blindly swinging a sword doesn’t come close to how good gunplay feels in fallout 4, dungeons in fallout each feel more unique, and the radio is such a good feature compared to not having the option. Also i simply find sci fi more interesting than medieval sorcery stuff.

    • Emerentia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m the exact opposite. I love Skyrim and Oblivion, but just couldn’t get into any of the Fallout games I’ve tried. I liked the Fallout games in a mechanical standpoint but I’ve never liked the post-apocalyptic genre so I just can’t keep interested.

    • Pekka@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Skyrim combat really doesn’t have many interesting things going on. Melee combat has very few options. Magic starts hard with too few mana and gets overpowered once you reach enchanting 100 (even without any bug abuse). And stealth archer also gets boring eventually. Fall Out 4 was a lot more fun with all the diverse guns (especially with modifying them yourself).

      I did really like the world of Oblivion and Skyrim, the worlds are filled with towns and NPCs. This felt so much better compared to Fallout 3. Fallout 4 had a lot more community going on and you had more diverse safe locations compared to Fallout 3.

    • CheshireSnake@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This is exactly why bkth Skyrim and Witcher 3 didn’t appeal to me. Idk, maybe I just like guns in games or the medieval era isn’t my cup of tea.

  • Bilb!@lem.monster
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Diablo and Diablo-style games like Torchlight. Every time a new one comes out a few of my friends get excited and I’ve been convinced to try it again, but I think I’ve learned my lesson finally and I have skipped Diablo IV.

    • preston@possumpat.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Glad to hear I’m not the only one. Something about the isometric/top-down ARPG genre has never clicked with me, and I really can’t figure out why. I’ve tried torchlight, every diablo (except 4), path of exile - I end up bouncing off of them after a week or so and just lose interest.

      It makes even less sense when you consider I can sink 300+ hours into Souls/Elden Ring or Xenoblade… Something about the format just doesn’t work for me, I guess.

    • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Diablo and Diablo 2 robbed years of my life. I just can’t get the same enjoyment out of any other game of the genre. I legit tried to give D3 a try… it was nothing the same… not even close.

      I don’t why Diablo and D2 were so damn good (IMO) and why the others just aren’t.

      RTS games have similar problems for me too… I played C&C and Starcraft a lot… there’ve been no other RTS games that I can even tolerate. Even going back and playing the C&C remaster… It’s just better even though it’s laden with old game QOL issues.

  • Honkinwaffles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Destiny 2! The game is total trash. The combat is so fucking boring, its just nothing but bullet sponge bosses with simple ass mechanics.

    I know that lots of people love it but man I do not understand lol

    • OnoreDikeido@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve played Destiny 2 religiously throughout Warmind up to Shadowkeep, but after giving it some thought, I feel like I agree with you. Most of the fun I’ve had in that game was because I played it with my friends. We were happy messing around and shooting at each other’s backsides and maybe occasionally getting something done in the scarce 3-player content there was, kind of like a glorified hangout space, but if I had to play it by myself? I don’t know, chief. I do love the feel of the guns and the lore (up to a certain point), but I wouldn’t call the game itself a good time.