Incorrect AI-generated answers are forming a feedback loop of misinformation online.

  • snaggen@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well, for eggs, that are carbon based, you will in fact have problems since carbon doesn’t have a liquid state at regular atmospheric pressure. I guess you can add pressure, but is that really what we mean when asking a question if something melt?

    • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If I simply ask “can eggs melt” and the answer is complicated but still yes, I would hope it to explain the complications and not just say yes. But I mean, if I just wanted a yes or no answer, and it’s technically correct, I’m cool with that. I could always follow up with “how” if the simple answer doesn’t satisfy me.

      • snaggen@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Well, I agree. But what I mean is that when people ask physics questions, it is often implicitly understood to mean under current conditions. You rarely hear normal people or kids (who I find asks most of the physics question) include anything about frictionless vacuums in the question. (For reference: https://xkcd.com/669/ ). So, for the egg question, regular people would most likely consider the answer to be “No, except under very special circumstances”. But, I agree with you that if a simple Yes/No answer is expected, it have to be Yes.

        • Zeoic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Wouldn’t that be true for everything then? 3,400C is pretty special circumstances in my book, yet we say tungsten melts.

          • Rodeo
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t think adding heat is a special circumstance like adding pressure is. It’s very easy to add heat to something. Adding pressure means building a sealed environment to enclose it’s, and some specialized equipment to increase the pressure.

            Adding heat requires that you burn something. That’s it.

          • snaggen@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes, you have a point. However adding heat is often implicit when talking about melting stuff. However, if it requires 3400C, then the answer would probably include a comment about that.